From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hw5Kj-0007H7-NU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:54:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l56NqrU3011870; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:52:53 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (66-191-187-123.dhcp.gnvl.sc.charter.com [66.191.187.123]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l56NmLx9004187 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 23:48:21 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8033C2480E2 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:36:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1LJ2TGh48ceG for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:36:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.100.51] (dsl211-165-131.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net [74.211.165.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF95248079 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 19:36:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors - improve the concept or discard it? From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200706061916.02515.expose@luftgetrock.net> References: <1181074192.12669.16.camel@antares.hausnetz> <20070606152947.GH26971@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <200706061810.50562.philantrop@gentoo.org> <200706061916.02515.expose@luftgetrock.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pBEH8PS6tHGHCDbVZYlO" Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:47:50 -0700 Message-Id: <1181173670.15396.50.camel@workbox.quova.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 X-Archives-Salt: 9af80355-42d0-4817-8957-add37c60e429 X-Archives-Hash: 68ef6a2907dab855f091488ad6a8483e --=-pBEH8PS6tHGHCDbVZYlO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 19:16 +0200, expose@luftgetrock.net wrote: > Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > > I'm sure they have the best intentions but I've never seen any clear > > guidelines for them. They use their best judgement what to handle and > > what not to but due to language barriers, cultural differences etc. it'= s > > difficult to judge. > The guideline, as far as I understood it, was (and is?) to ban people who= dont=20 > abide by the time-outs. What guideline? Where is it? When was it approved by the Council, like we had said that proctors policy would need to be? --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-pBEH8PS6tHGHCDbVZYlO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGZ0emkT4lNIS36YERAkheAJ9fKLpyuEzmkywmrDgXzAT00CRRhgCgirqF 6nQoyuqISRzFVmvJpTAPN7g= =Tfyz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pBEH8PS6tHGHCDbVZYlO-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list