From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HpU4V-0005Va-71 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 18:54:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4JIrVAn027186; Sat, 19 May 2007 18:53:31 GMT Received: from nemesis.fprintf.net (nemesis.fprintf.net [66.134.112.218]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4JIpdXI025000 for ; Sat, 19 May 2007 18:51:40 GMT Received: (qmail 28775 invoked by uid 210); 19 May 2007 14:51:39 -0400 Received: from 192.168.0.8 by nemesis (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.90.2/3269. spamassassin: 3.1.8. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:0(192.168.0.8):SA:0(-4.4/5.0):. Processed in 0.210605 secs); 19 May 2007 18:51:39 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 Received: from athena.fprintf.net (HELO ?192.168.0.8?) (dang@fprintf.net@192.168.0.8) by nemesis.fprintf.net with SMTP; 19 May 2007 14:51:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing expat 2.0.0 From: Daniel Gryniewicz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20070518233313.37e2b17f@luna.home> References: <38928.192.168.2.155.1179228617.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <41798.192.168.2.155.1179229621.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <1179231162.29352.7.camel@localhost> <200705151714.24800.carlo@gentoo.org> <20070518233313.37e2b17f@luna.home> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 14:51:27 -0400 Message-Id: <1179600688.3083.369.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.11.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b85ada96-eba8-48ca-982c-0ab1355dcbf4 X-Archives-Hash: 0c1502a0aa653cb613494c47807eec71 On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 23:33 +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Steve Long : > > > Carsten Lohrke wrote: > > > the amd64 team is unresponsive on even trivial stabilisation > > > request form the KDE team as well, lately. > > > > > welp's been away ;) > > welp does not touch KDE packages... > More importantly, I don't think anyone currently active on amd64 does touch KDE packages. Looking at changelogs, kugelfang is active (but not stabling amd64, it seems); wolf31o2 and cryos are away; lanius, absinthe, and jhuebel are no longer on amd64; that leaves malc, who hasn't done anything kde related since 2004, as far as I can see. I suspect the kde team and the amd64 team need to get together to find someone who can test KDE on amd64. Daniel -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list