From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-23790-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HojEF-0005uZ-2U
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 May 2007 16:53:27 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4HGqTSK021487;
	Thu, 17 May 2007 16:52:29 GMT
Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (mail.obsidian-studios.com [72.17.152.163])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4HGmBEX014677
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 17 May 2007 16:48:11 GMT
Received: (qmail 5093 invoked from network); 17 May 2007 16:48:11 -0000
Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (HELO ?192.168.1.211?) (192.168.0.51)
  by mail.obsidian-studios.com with SMTP; 17 May 2007 16:48:11 -0000
Received: from 192.168.1.211 ([192.168.1.211] helo=[192.168.1.211]) by
	assp.obsidian-studios.com; 17 May 2007 12:48:11 -0400
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of
	Emacs virtual packages
From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20070517160300.20e86e20@snowflake>
References: <17993.36648.37167.198946@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	 <1179335734.23409.3.camel@workbox.quova.com>
	 <17995.17641.192440.220599@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	 <1179346063.7620.4.camel@workbox.quova.com>
	 <1179350638.22964.15.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com>
	 <20070517084927.299b2f2f@snowflake>
	 <1179413949.26565.2.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com>
	 <20070517160300.20e86e20@snowflake>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-4BjQOCg7POw8MVMnSjEg"
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:48:11 -0400
Message-Id: <1179420491.26565.10.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 
X-Archives-Salt: 4be069f4-4c30-40f0-b0cc-96ee4b381d99
X-Archives-Hash: 902ae671ed7da569e58a3809f881110a


--=-4BjQOCg7POw8MVMnSjEg
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 16:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 10:59:09 -0400
> "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > Policy says to go with upstream's naming. This is, after all, why we
> > > have categories.
> >=20
> > Sure, and along those lines upstream seems to call it ant_menu or
> > ant_menu.vim :)
> >=20
> > http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=3D155
>=20
> Not for the versions in the tree they don't.

You mean 0.5.3 released 2003-12-28. IMHO that borderlines a stale
package or one that should be punted. Or at min bumped since there has
been two releases since then. With the latest one being 0.5.5
2006-11-19.

So is that app really used? Does anyone care about? Sure looks like not
in both cases.

--=20
William L. Thomson Jr.
Gentoo/Java

--=-4BjQOCg7POw8MVMnSjEg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGTIdLPrChP8zZLyYRAglAAJ46F6Zb8O82WporKAgimPaNYlKAcwCgkxRX
AfYDoAbRjwIHazyJnjMHJrw=
=8vB6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-4BjQOCg7POw8MVMnSjEg--

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list