From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-23766-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HoR1H-0003vl-4Z
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 21:26:51 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4GLPsom025200;
	Wed, 16 May 2007 21:25:54 GMT
Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (mail.obsidian-studios.com [72.17.152.163])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4GLNvwJ022894
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 May 2007 21:23:58 GMT
Received: (qmail 19591 invoked from network); 16 May 2007 21:23:57 -0000
Received: from mail.obsidian-studios.com (HELO ?192.168.1.211?) (192.168.0.51)
  by mail.obsidian-studios.com with SMTP; 16 May 2007 21:23:57 -0000
Received: from 192.168.1.211 ([192.168.1.211] helo=[192.168.1.211]) by
	assp.obsidian-studios.com; 16 May 2007 17:23:57 -0400
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages with same name was -> Conversion of
	Emacs virtual packages
From: "William L. Thomson Jr." <wltjr@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1179346063.7620.4.camel@workbox.quova.com>
References: <17993.36648.37167.198946@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	 <1179335734.23409.3.camel@workbox.quova.com>
	 <17995.17641.192440.220599@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	 <1179346063.7620.4.camel@workbox.quova.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-II89KnBKu6DJu66Q1IRO"
Organization: Gentoo
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 17:23:58 -0400
Message-Id: <1179350638.22964.15.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 
X-Archives-Salt: d6fb69d9-1947-44b2-8fc1-9380e9c244d1
X-Archives-Hash: 0c66715c67c778d6d8ccae7c911c62b1


--=-II89KnBKu6DJu66Q1IRO
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 13:07 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 19:52 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >
> > New-style virtuals are just *packages*, or did I get this completely
> > wrong? So how is this situation different from two packages with the
> > same name, but in different categories?
>=20
> It isn't different.  That's the problem.  If you have two packages with
> the same name, you have the same problem.

On that note I would hope the vim/vi peeps would rename.
app-vim/ant

It's quite annoying when one needs the real ANT ( dev-java/ant ), not
the vim menu plugin so vi can invoke ant or etc.

IMHO app-vim/ant should really be app-vim/vim-ant or something other
than just ant.

Personal pet peeve of some time now, just lacked the occasion to mention
it till now ;)


--=20
William L. Thomson Jr.
Gentoo/Java

--=-II89KnBKu6DJu66Q1IRO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGS3ZtPrChP8zZLyYRApFQAKDvBbHm5AMoCldzjJd9JaJLH0IR3QCgg018
npfb6XZq/+GKD2XAwWsLP1A=
=lpLB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-II89KnBKu6DJu66Q1IRO--

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list