From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HnvVi-0001cx-V0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 11:48:11 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l4FBkdQd025602; Tue, 15 May 2007 11:46:39 GMT Received: from smtp-gw1.starman.ee (smtp-out5.starman.ee [85.253.0.7]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4FBhKMC020875 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 11:43:20 GMT Received: from mx1.starman.ee (mx1.starman.ee [62.65.192.16]) by smtp-gw1.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72E6A2152A for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 14:43:13 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx1.starman.ee Received: from [192.168.0.21] (pc219.host2.trt.starman.ee [62.65.237.219]) by mx1.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7CB3F4058 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 14:43:13 +0300 (EEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing expat 2.0.0 From: Mart Raudsepp To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <38928.192.168.2.155.1179228617.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> References: <38928.192.168.2.155.1179228617.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-A9HOFXUZsJox5Fskoh7O" Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:40:51 +0300 Message-Id: <1179229251.29352.2.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 X-Archives-Salt: e52a2ee7-07eb-44ab-a87f-0ba6ef7023e9 X-Archives-Hash: 66c18692902e2aa0d3c4ab09b46b2c2a --=-A9HOFXUZsJox5Fskoh7O Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 07:30 -0400, Caleb Tennis wrote: > I'd like to open a bug soon requesting the stabiliztion of dev-libs/expat= -2.0.0*.=20 > It's currently assigned to tcltk, but the bug traffic seems to indicate t= hey don't > know why they have it. If nobody steps up, objects, and is willing to ta= ke over > maintenance I will do so. >=20 > * - This version has a new soname, so it will require a revdep-rebuild, w= hich is > probably why it hasn't been stabilized as of now. Yeah, exactly. I was too late to have things sorted out with people maintaining (or the lack of it) to have this stabilized together with GNOME-2.16, as the biggest desktop environments need to be revdep-rebuilt to a large extent if not using --as-needed. I hope you guys are going to do it together with a large KDE stabilization spree then or something. I can time GNOME-2.16.3 stabilization to the same time as well, to minimize otherwise useless revdep-rebuilding and include this with version updates. Some pointer to use -X (--package-names) flag for revdep-rebuild somewhere might be a good idea. --=20 Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: leio@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio --=-A9HOFXUZsJox5Fskoh7O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGSZxDkeYb6olFHJcRAnHnAKDJTe5Bzw4UQ02nAqzaK+nOaSANmwCeNYsZ dyeiW4rs6wUTS6Zht280Prc= =wm9x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-A9HOFXUZsJox5Fskoh7O-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list