From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HgRsx-0008SY-4n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:45:15 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3OKhoq3016516; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:43:50 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3OKduO9010409 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:39:57 GMT Received: from onyx.private.gni.com (wall.sjc2.gni.com [69.80.192.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0481964E9F for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:39:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 From: Ned Ludd To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <462E61EA.5010205@gentoo.org> References: <200704242111.44663.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <462E5796.8080707@gentoo.org> <20070424203751.0eae1394@maya> <462E5F58.3080402@gentoo.org> <20070424195327.GA10368@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <462E61EA.5010205@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:39:54 -0700 Message-Id: <1177447194.16472.20.camel@onyx.private.gni.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id l3OKhos0016516 X-Archives-Salt: f15cb059-d403-4693-a97d-b45b80311353 X-Archives-Hash: 7a56f634d2e22f7e7dddb977d304573e On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 16:00 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Bryan =D8stergaard wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > > =20 > >> Stephen Bennett wrote: > >> =20 > >>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:16:38 -0400 > >>> Doug Goldstein wrote: > >>> > >>> =20 > >>> =20 > >>>> So apparently as little as 1 council member can make a decision an= d it > >>>> be binding unless appealed to the entire council at the next meeti= ng. > >>>> =20 > >>>> =20 > >>> There were three council members who happened to be around at the t= ime, > >>> and those three agreed unanimously. That seems reasonable to me for= an > >>> interim decision. > >>> =20 > >>> =20 > >> Is it that serious of an issue that it needed to be done as such and > >> could not wait for a regular council meeting? > >> > >> Granted I understand it's important for you paludis users since palu= dis > >> doesn't support that. > >> But I'm talking about real Gentoo users that use Portage. > >> > >> I think we are setting a VERY dangerous precedent by allowing a subs= et > >> of council members to make decisions as a whole if they decide to ma= ke a > >> decision outside of a normal session. > >> > >> Who were the 3? > >> =20 > > Already stated in another reply on this thread but the three council > > members were robbat2, kugelfang and myself. > > > > Regards, > > Bryan =D8stergaard > > =20 > Bryan, >=20 > You and Danny have clearly shown your bias towards paludis take over an= d > support of Gentoo. It's fairly poor taste to FORCE this through during = a > non-regular meeting for something that paludis is lacking. >=20 > It's AMAZING how fast you guys are to clamor and fix what you call a QA > issue and other problems when we've had issues highlighted for years > that the council can't move on. But once it's a possible issue with > paludis you guys are quick to respond. You might be overreacting a little here. To bring you up to speed vapier actually filed the original bug for this after I first noticed one of these atoms creeping into the tree while doing pre release atom compare testing for portage-utils around early February. Till this moment there was no definitive decision of any sort. --=20 Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list