From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hc2lS-000617-GE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:07:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3CH6FvR025815; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:06:15 GMT Received: from smtp01.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (smtp-out1.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net [70.43.63.18]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3CH4AnR023418 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:04:10 GMT Received: from [10.3.23.140] (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp01.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3CH46Er019052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:04:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20070412170408.1758d598@snowflake> References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <200704051520.13827.vapier@gentoo.org> <1175807920.6548.26.camel@onyx.private.gni.com> <20070412164748.TA88c9d.tv@veller.net> <20070412095423.50e07022@sed-192.sedsystems.ca> <20070412170408.1758d598@snowflake> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Bb9ITLDVd/N5YBwIFHXB" Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 13:04:06 -0400 Message-Id: <1176397446.17583.1.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.0 X-Archives-Salt: 532730cd-f2c3-41c4-bcee-3473b76f379c X-Archives-Hash: 1912cfdfa14cc80aaeaeae7019f682dd --=-Bb9ITLDVd/N5YBwIFHXB Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 17:04 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Instead, why not look into reducing the amount of traffic on -core? Actually, the amount of traffic on -core these days has been pretty minimal. In some weeks, the only messages setn are my GWN proofreading requests. Sure, there are still some things that are sent to -core that don't need to be, but the volume has come way down from the worst prior levels. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-Bb9ITLDVd/N5YBwIFHXB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGHmaGkT4lNIS36YERAmJ1AJ92t10lSHa6IhFEozQePcAO66LkSQCdEgNY HFrCr7wcvN40PdpGsKtcwP0= =6vFy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Bb9ITLDVd/N5YBwIFHXB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list