From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1Hbegj-0005yy-0d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:24:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3BFNoJA016495; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:23:50 GMT Received: from smtp02.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (smtp-out2.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net [70.43.63.19]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3BFL9mq012996 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:21:10 GMT Received: from [10.3.23.140] (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp02.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3BFL9RC003966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:21:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New metastructure proposal From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20070411005935.f3adf691.genone@gentoo.org> References: <20070410193249.GD7991@ubik> <20070411005935.f3adf691.genone@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/LrpwIBI26llUBY89IR6" Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:21:05 -0400 Message-Id: <1176304865.8755.66.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 X-Archives-Salt: 58f7104e-6e93-4969-a981-ca5187cf2645 X-Archives-Hash: a3e7ed3ef9b94d4dc90f3f4ace3d1aa3 --=-/LrpwIBI26llUBY89IR6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:59 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > I like the part about projects being self-organizing, but splitting up th= e tree is a no go from my POV. Are they not already? Aside from the global requirements on what it takes to be a developer, projects are able to recruit anyone that they want. If they have an overlay, the person needs not even meet the requirements for being a developer. Does the Council interfere in the recruitment of new developers into projects? If the answer is no, then what change would actually be made and what problems would it solve? It looks like to me there would be no change in how we operate currently. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-/LrpwIBI26llUBY89IR6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGHPzhkT4lNIS36YERAtz9AKDBX/HgH4WidSts4eEdyQI0vrjZOgCeP8X7 nTUNz2xwNkjgD9Ld3cmvLVE= =KHKd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/LrpwIBI26llUBY89IR6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list