From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HbdO6-0006AR-K1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:01:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3BDxRFS031294; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:59:27 GMT Received: from smtp01.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (smtp-out1.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net [70.43.63.18]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3BDsp3s023040 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:54:52 GMT Received: from [10.3.23.140] (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp01.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3BDsnQJ016390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:54:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: extending project xml to have stuff that the project is working on and collect them as Gentoo current goals From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <461BFEF8.1000400@gentoo.org> References: <461BF4D1.6090204@gentoo.org> <1176239513.8836.31.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <461BFEF8.1000400@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-a+kUk2+G14NtsfWyQJjK" Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:54:48 -0400 Message-Id: <1176299688.8755.36.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 X-Archives-Salt: db3859f8-e61c-4fab-a5ef-9e3ed9dd3be3 X-Archives-Hash: 37fa7ec5171ed68569eae40c633f0f7c --=-a+kUk2+G14NtsfWyQJjK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:17 +0300, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti: > > On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > >> Then we require this file to be updated > >> monthly. What do you think?=20 > >=20 > > I think Release Engineering would kill you in our off time. This has > > been brought up before, but some projects just don't have enough going > > on to update on a regular cycle. > >=20 >=20 > So you just change the date? I don't think we should require anything > but acknowledgment that the old data still applies. So turn it into one more mundane and pointless task that I am forced to perform simply because it is a matter of policy? Having to go around saying "yes, this is still correct" is rather wasteful, is it not? I know I would have to do this for several projects, all of which are not the sort to really have updates to publish. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-a+kUk2+G14NtsfWyQJjK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGHOiokT4lNIS36YERAqcUAJ0XWBjnF5vIFnCNakwYtSa2zvXPqQCfQmgb GMiUyBrak2GCwLJweCUdO8E= =19ln -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-a+kUk2+G14NtsfWyQJjK-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list