Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: extending project xml to have stuff that the project is working on and collect them as Gentoo current goals

[Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1065 bytes --]

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 00:17 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
> > On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 23:34 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> Then we require this file to be updated
> >> monthly. What do you think? 
> > 
> > I think Release Engineering would kill you in our off time.  This has
> > been brought up before, but some projects just don't have enough going
> > on to update on a regular cycle.
> > 
> 
> So you just change the date? I don't think we should require anything
> but acknowledgment that the old data still applies.

So turn it into one more mundane and pointless task that I am forced to
perform simply because it is a matter of policy?  Having to go around
saying "yes, this is still correct" is rather wasteful, is it not?  I
know I would have to do this for several projects, all of which are not
the sort to really have updates to publish.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]