From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HZYiZ-00034d-Ve for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 20:38:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l35KZYqW017531; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:35:34 GMT Received: from smtp01.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (smtp-out1.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net [70.43.63.18]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l35KVL0A010877 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:31:21 GMT Received: from [10.3.23.140] (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp01.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l35KVIqH006315 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 16:31:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200704052215.23988.kugelfang@gentoo.org> References: <20070401092940.1B4C26441E@smtp.gentoo.org> <20070405092641.00676b6d@snowflake> <20070405120912.GA5025@superlupo> <200704052215.23988.kugelfang@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-69cMFUzsedsvFwsfTDcH" Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:31:18 -0400 Message-Id: <1175805078.8641.72.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 X-Archives-Salt: 59984903-76ca-4f58-85d9-faced1962d00 X-Archives-Hash: a692cbb8c73667f37a452ac77a323e61 --=-69cMFUzsedsvFwsfTDcH Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 22:15 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2007 14:09 schrieb Wernfried Haas: > > If they want to have sekrit meetings with sekrit handshakes, let > > them. If enough people think this is not acceptable, they'll be gone > > on the next election. > Especially as there are council members who don't rely like any privacy=20 > in that at all. vapier comes to my mind there :-D I don't like it, either. I understand that there are sometimes requirements on keeping things private, but I'm all for doing everything as publicly as possible. It keeps complete wastes of time like this current thread from cropping up as easily, for one. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-69cMFUzsedsvFwsfTDcH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGFVyWkT4lNIS36YERAtpZAJ0Zv5iigrz82vkv2HuxM5ZGiqjFLwCfRHUL 3PHil2P6uWyv66MY1IJLA9k= =aLyE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-69cMFUzsedsvFwsfTDcH-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list