From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HXmWW-000171-TX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:58:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2VMtotP030831; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:55:50 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2VMq7Pk025066 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:52:08 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.138] (c-66-30-3-184.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [66.30.3.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208BE64C88 for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [soc] Python bindings for Paludis From: Seemant Kulleen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <200703302341.26115.kugelfang@gentoo.org> <1175307986.5961.6.camel@localhost> <200703311453.41877.csawtell@paradise.net.nz> <1175311904.5961.8.camel@localhost> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+B8j/mZh2bEQEfWn04uM" Organization: Gentoo Foundation Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:51:33 -0400 Message-Id: <1175381493.5961.33.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 X-Archives-Salt: c5303fc5-f95f-4105-8651-8d867a78bfea X-Archives-Hash: 228632f52e24ace357a1357b4be89abf --=-+B8j/mZh2bEQEfWn04uM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 23:39 +0100, Steve Long wrote: > Seemant Kulleen wrote: > > That's uncalled for. There's no need to get nasty. >=20 > I applaud your intent, but feel it would have far more effect on the > atmosphere if applied to a few of your devs, rather than users who employ > milder terms? >=20 > It just seems knowingly unfair, and I don't believe that is your purpose. Not getting into this. If your intent is to undermine, please do it privately. If you're just trying to be inflammatory (as you seem to be often), please put a stop to it *NOW*. Like I've said before, just because you know how to type an email and send it, doesn't mean you *should*. =20 You can check my posts to see me address anyone getting out of hand. Thanks, Seemant --=-+B8j/mZh2bEQEfWn04uM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGDuX0iUTIoXwgiI0RAn7rAKCnA7B/gZ58vbPznPTBkOpx9vFS1QCeOwHs cPEsxSSKSmV/k05ySN1QBbU= =WPCH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+B8j/mZh2bEQEfWn04uM-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list