From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HXM8I-0004Yb-3f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:47:30 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2UIjnUV011560; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:45:49 GMT Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2UIgYBQ006931 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:42:34 GMT Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2007 18:42:34 -0000 Received: from chello080108115144.1.11.univie.teleweb.at (EHLO [192.168.0.102]) [80.108.115.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 30 Mar 2007 20:42:34 +0200 X-Authenticated: #28563408 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19R9/9zQfRR+1MX50CqUU4SptEm06LaB3u7yahZ+m OCxbpkFnn1JI0Y Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis From: Matthias Langer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200703301404.16400.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <200703240028.15461.peper@gentoo.org> <200703271519.29674.vapier@gentoo.org> <20070327211510.0b426e09@snowflake> <200703301404.16400.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:42:32 +0200 Message-Id: <1175280152.5696.12.camel@sputnik886.lnet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Archives-Salt: 5be782f1-8066-4d79-b285-a38f576d41ed X-Archives-Hash: e034b041da5485ca98e0b016c18b61da On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 14:04 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Do you acknowledge that Portage is a severe limiting factor when it > > comes to improving the Gentoo user experience as a whole? > > what a lame question ... rather than waste time on this, why dont we get to > some relevant issues ... > > to start with, Paludis will never be an official package manager for Gentoo so > long as you are heavily involved. i don't think that personal issues should be taken into account when it comes to choosing a new official package manager for gentoo. Matthias -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list