From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HWGRS-0001ly-SW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:30:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2RISPTi025759; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:28:25 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2RIPsBl022616 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:25:54 GMT Received: from onyx.private.gni.com (wall.sjc2.gni.com [69.80.192.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9369664B15 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract From: Ned Ludd To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4607E6B7.7020503@exceedtech.net> References: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich> <200703251647.31125.vapier@gentoo.org> <1174859217.4883.81.camel@bruichladdich> <1174915159.8207.17.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <4607E6B7.7020503@exceedtech.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 11:07:40 -0700 Message-Id: <1175018860.20959.42.camel@onyx.private.gni.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d24bdc66-8f94-49a6-a59f-f387a2fe52af X-Archives-Hash: d7829b43e20f4d14f37efa1c9129e077 On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 10:28 -0500, Dale wrote: > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 22:46 +0100, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > > > > > And how exactly does this help us in the event of say the OSL burning > > > down or the GNi suffering flooding? :) > > > > > > > Well, we're on the second floor of the data center which has a quite > > large basement, which would likely absorb most of the water. About the > > only feasible way for our stuff to get flooded is if the San Andreas > > finally gets the "big one" and the west coast of the US falls into the > > Pacific, in which case, we'll be worried about other issues, I'm sure. 3rd floor in C.06 actually. > > That being said, you're more than welcome to assist Infrastructure (and > > the Foundation) in finding new hosting locations as well as the manpower > > to bring new services up in those locations or moving existing services. > > Doing moves like this is a bunch of work, and not something I feel we > > should be "dumping" on the Infrastructure team. > > > > > > Can I assume this building has indoor plumbing? It can be on the top > floor and still get flooded. I saw a house once that the hot water > heater busted and water was about a foot deep and was coming out the > walls. > > More than one way to "flood" a building. :/ Flooding/burning etc are not likely to happen. See page two of the spec for more details. http://www.365main.com/images/365_Main_San_Francisco_CA.pdf -- Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list