From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HVRzK-0000kx-6d for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:38:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l2PCbMLm020738; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:37:22 GMT Received: from pan.object4.net (pan.object4.net [80.82.141.134]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l2PCZYWr018549 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 12:35:34 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pan.object4.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A806809B for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:35:34 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pan.object4.net X-Spam-Score: -0.566 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.566 tagged_above=-100 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046] Received: from pan.object4.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pan.object4.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WJEQLYr+tYDQ for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:35:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.99] (82-46-45-120.cable.ubr06.newt.blueyonder.co.uk [82.46.45.120]) by pan.object4.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834946809A for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:35:33 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract From: Christel Dahlskjaer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200703250454.34744.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <1174788467.4883.29.camel@bruichladdich> <200703250454.34744.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hlQjmE8ClR+z+jwYSuK/" Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:35:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1174826133.4883.45.camel@bruichladdich> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: 8d155b97-506f-4fd9-9fb2-18f1675cfd1a X-Archives-Hash: c99f153f563a8d97ad1c8a37e8b16d6f --=-hlQjmE8ClR+z+jwYSuK/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2007-03-25 at 04:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Saturday 24 March 2007, Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > > It looks like our social contract doesn't prohibit Gentoo from being > > dependent upon a single sponsor or corporation. In the interests of > > keeping Gentoo run by the developers rather than any outside party, how > > about the following addition to the Social Contract? > > > > We will be run by the Development Community > > Gentoo will be run by the development community. We will never allow > > ourselves to be reliant upon a single sponsor or corporation. >=20 > i dont see why this is required ? ignoring the fact that the wording is = way=20 > too vague to do anything but cause confusion and people to spout long win= ded=20 > rants, seems like useless nitpicking about an issue that doesnt exist Supposedly >80% of our stuff is hosted in one building, where would we find ourselves were this building to building to burn to the ground? Get flooded?=20 --=-hlQjmE8ClR+z+jwYSuK/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGBmyV0WARHgC5cN0RAhQlAJ0eHmcdMqXMQg32kR29KYEkNgAhSgCgjRVo Q61HZABroqbPW0XEr8+Wnrk= =GQfn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hlQjmE8ClR+z+jwYSuK/-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list