From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DCBABD6F for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 03:21:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [195.20.224.219] (helo=mrvdom03.kundenserver.de) by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #3) id 17GbT9-00085s-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 10:21:07 +0200 Received: from [80.132.13.33] (helo=eiche.ahsoftware) by mrvdom03.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #3) id 17GbT9-0005X4-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 10:21:07 +0200 Received: from krabat.ahsoftware (krabat.ahsoftware [192.168.207.2]) by eiche.ahsoftware (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id g588KVx01053 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 10:20:31 +0200 Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 10:23:49 +0200 From: Alexander Holler To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Optimized Qt Message-ID: <117320000.1023524629@krabat.ahsoftware> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 59cdb897-03a3-4cb0-bc87-26612975321b X-Archives-Hash: d82b16393d836d644d0aa8d75ec5e3aa Hello, --On Freitag, Juni 07, 2002 11:50:38 +0530 Prashanth Aditya Susarla wrote: > Someone wanted to know if Qt compiled with higher optimization than its > default was stable or not. I have just merged Qt compiled with > -march=athlon-tbird -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -mmmx -m3dnow > (gcc-3.1, binutils-2.12.90.0.7, glibc-2.2.5-r4) and the emerge completed > successfully. I am also working in my KDE now and there seem to be no > breakages/crashes. > Untar qt-copy-3.0.4.tar.bz2 and edit > qt-copy-3.0.4/mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf (it was linux-g++ in my case, > it could be different for others) and re-archive the entire tree. Then > ebuild qt-3.0.4-20020606-r1.ebuild digest would recompute the digests and > one can proceed with the emerge. Obviously, this new digest file would be > overwritten in the next emerge rsync. Good idea, maybe this could go into the next ebuild, here's a patch for the actual ebuild: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- --- qt-3.0.4.20020606-r1.ebuild.ori 2002-06-08 09:59:05.000000000 +0200 +++ qt-3.0.4.20020606-r1.ebuild 2002-06-08 10:22:09.000000000 +0200 @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ cp configure configure.orig sed -e 's:read acceptance:acceptance=yes:' \ -e 's:|-repeater|:|-nas-sound|-repeater|:' configure.orig > configure + cp mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf.orig + sed -e "s/-O2/${CFLAGS}/" mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf.orig > mkspecs/linux-g++/qmake.conf } --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- Regards, Alexander