* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 7:20 [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC Robin H. Johnson
@ 2006-12-18 7:35 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-12-18 13:47 ` Chris Gianelloni
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2006-12-18 7:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 487 bytes --]
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 11:20:38PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
...
> Removals:
> x11-wm/qvwm 2006-12-04 06:40:02 omp
...
Oops, I accidently included the previous batch in the attachment.
Sorry.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 7:20 [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC Robin H. Johnson
2006-12-18 7:35 ` Robin H. Johnson
@ 2006-12-18 13:47 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-12-18 14:13 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-12-18 14:51 ` [gentoo-dev] New packages, but why? Chris Gianelloni
2006-12-18 15:02 ` [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC Chris Gianelloni
3 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gianelloni @ 2006-12-18 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 515 bytes --]
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
So what is right, the attachment or the list in the email?
I know that my removals/additions from the list are correct, so what is
the attachment?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 13:47 ` Chris Gianelloni
@ 2006-12-18 14:13 ` Chris Gianelloni
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gianelloni @ 2006-12-18 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 536 bytes --]
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 08:47 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> > from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
>
> So what is right, the attachment or the list in the email?
Nevermind... just saw your second mail.
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] New packages, but why?
2006-12-18 7:20 [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC Robin H. Johnson
2006-12-18 7:35 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-12-18 13:47 ` Chris Gianelloni
@ 2006-12-18 14:51 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-12-18 15:02 ` [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC Chris Gianelloni
3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gianelloni @ 2006-12-18 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 578 bytes --]
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> app-crypt/asedriveiiie-usb 2006-12-16 11:04:37 alonbl
> app-crypt/asedriveiiie-serial 2006-12-16 11:05:13 alonbl
Just curious about these two packages. Why were they added to the tree?
There is already sys-apps/pcsc-ase-iiie-drv which handles both the USB
and Serial versions of this hardware. Is there something else I am
missing?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 7:20 [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC Robin H. Johnson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-12-18 14:51 ` [gentoo-dev] New packages, but why? Chris Gianelloni
@ 2006-12-18 15:02 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-12-18 15:33 ` Yuri Vasilevski
2006-12-18 19:14 ` Robin H. Johnson
3 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gianelloni @ 2006-12-18 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1185 bytes --]
On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
OK. Here's a fun question for you...
Is it possible to have a slightly modified version of this script run,
and the output sent to gwn-feedback for inclusion in the GWN? This
would make my life tremendously easier, since currently I have to
completely reformat this by hand.
Basically, I would want the output to look like:
<table>
<tr>
<th>Package:</th>
<th>Addition date:</th>
<th>Contact:</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<ti>sci-biology/amap</ti>
<ti>11 Dec 06</ti>
<ti><mail link="dberkholz@gentoo.org">Donnie Berkholz</mail></ti>
</tr>
</table>
<table>
<tr>
<th>Package:</th>
<th>Removal date:</th>
<th>Contact:</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<ti>games-fps/ut2004-domain2049</ti>
<ti>12 Dec 06</ti>
<ti><mail link="wolf31o2@gentoo.org">Chris Gianelloni</mail></ti>
</tr>
</table>
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 15:02 ` [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC Chris Gianelloni
@ 2006-12-18 15:33 ` Yuri Vasilevski
2006-12-18 16:38 ` Alec Warner
2006-12-18 19:15 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-12-18 19:14 ` Robin H. Johnson
1 sibling, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Vasilevski @ 2006-12-18 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:02:00 -0500
Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or
> > removed from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
>
> OK. Here's a fun question for you...
>
> Is it possible to have a slightly modified version of this script run,
> and the output sent to gwn-feedback for inclusion in the GWN? This
> would make my life tremendously easier, since currently I have to
> completely reformat this by hand.
>
> Basically, I would want the output to look like:
I think it should also include the Homepage(s) and Description of the
packages so readers could easily check what that additions are all
about. While I'm not that sure that additions date and probably who
made the addition are that important for readers.
> <table>
>
> <tr>
> <th>Package:</th>
> <th>Addition date:</th>
> <th>Contact:</th>
> </tr>
>
> <tr>
> <ti>sci-biology/amap</ti>
> <ti>11 Dec 06</ti>
> <ti><mail link="dberkholz@gentoo.org">Donnie Berkholz</mail></ti>
> </tr>
>
> </table>
So I think it should be something like:
<table>
<tr>
<th>Package:</th>
<th>Homepage:</th>
<th>Description:</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<ti><uri link="http://packages.gentoo.org/packages/?category=sci-biology;name=amap
so">sci-biology/amap</uri></ti>
<ti><uri link="http://bio.math.berkeley.edu/amap/">Homepage</uri></ti>
<ti>Protein multiple-alignment-based sequence annealing</ti>
</tr>
</table>
Best,
Yuri.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 15:33 ` Yuri Vasilevski
@ 2006-12-18 16:38 ` Alec Warner
2006-12-18 19:04 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-12-18 20:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Yuri Vasilevski
2006-12-18 19:15 ` Robin H. Johnson
1 sibling, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Alec Warner @ 2006-12-18 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:02:00 -0500
> Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>
>>On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>
>>>The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or
>>>removed from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
>>
>>OK. Here's a fun question for you...
>>
>>Is it possible to have a slightly modified version of this script run,
>>and the output sent to gwn-feedback for inclusion in the GWN? This
>>would make my life tremendously easier, since currently I have to
>>completely reformat this by hand.
>>
>>Basically, I would want the output to look like:
Yeah I can modify the output to do tables. If I can find the script, I
know it's on one of these lab machines ;)
>
>
> I think it should also include the Homepage(s) and Description of the
> packages so readers could easily check what that additions are all
> about. While I'm not that sure that additions date and probably who
> made the addition are that important for readers.
The only reason the contact and date are there is because the code for
removals and additions is basically the same (A or D tells me which one
it is) and all that info is available in the CVS history file. The
problem with HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION is that they are version specific
and there is no way to choose which version to pick in the case where
more than one version was added at the same time.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 16:38 ` Alec Warner
@ 2006-12-18 19:04 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-12-20 5:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steve Long
2006-12-18 20:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Yuri Vasilevski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Chris Gianelloni @ 2006-12-18 19:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 743 bytes --]
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 11:38 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
> The only reason the contact and date are there is because the code for
> removals and additions is basically the same (A or D tells me which one
> it is) and all that info is available in the CVS history file. The
> problem with HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION is that they are version specific
> and there is no way to choose which version to pick in the case where
> more than one version was added at the same time.
As a compromise, how about having the package names link to their
packages.gentoo.org page?
--
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-dev] Re: Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 19:04 ` Chris Gianelloni
@ 2006-12-20 5:04 ` Steve Long
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Steve Long @ 2006-12-20 5:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 11:38 -0500, Alec Warner wrote:
>> The only reason the contact and date are there is because the code for
>> removals and additions is basically the same (A or D tells me which one
>> it is) and all that info is available in the CVS history file. The
>> problem with HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION is that they are version specific
>> and there is no way to choose which version to pick in the case where
>> more than one version was added at the same time.
>
> As a compromise, how about having the package names link to their
> packages.gentoo.org page?
>
That'd be much better as then we'd be able to check the bugs as well.
There's some other semi-official gentoo site that produces those details,
but not the bugs..
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 16:38 ` Alec Warner
2006-12-18 19:04 ` Chris Gianelloni
@ 2006-12-18 20:53 ` Yuri Vasilevski
2006-12-18 21:28 ` Robin H. Johnson
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Vasilevski @ 2006-12-18 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:38:14 -0500
Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > I think it should also include the Homepage(s) and Description of
> > the packages so readers could easily check what that additions are
> > all about. While I'm not that sure that additions date and probably
> > who made the addition are that important for readers.
>
> The only reason the contact and date are there is because the code
> for removals and additions is basically the same (A or D tells me
> which one it is) and all that info is available in the CVS history
> file. The problem with HOMEPAGE or DESCRIPTION is that they are
> version specific and there is no way to choose which version to pick
> in the case where more than one version was added at the same time.
The way I implemented this was to get the homepage(s) and description
from the newest version, but I think absolutely any convention will
work as in the very rare cases where someone commits several versions
with different homepages or descriptions, giving the info about just
one of the versions should be quite a good indicator on what this
package is all about, else the versions should not share the same
package name (in the case that they do completely different things).
Also, to get that info you can use portageq in a reasonably simple way,
something like:
let ebuild be $CATEGORY/$PF
homepage="$(PORTDIR_OVERLAY="${CVS_DIR}" portageq metadata / ebuild \
"${ebuild}" HOMEPAGE)"
description="$(PORTDIR_OVERLAY="${CVS_DIR}" portageq metadata / ebuild \
"${ebuild}" DESCRIPTION)"
This will make the script a little bit slower, but it should not be
that hard to integrate.
Best,
Yuri.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 20:53 ` [gentoo-dev] " Yuri Vasilevski
@ 2006-12-18 21:28 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-12-18 22:52 ` Yuri Vasilevski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2006-12-18 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 475 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:53:56PM -0600, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> This will make the script a little bit slower, but it should not be
> that hard to integrate.
Please read the message that I sent as well. In specific, there is NO
way we can gaurentee that the machine has an up to date copy of the tree
- thus why we use CVS history directly.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 21:28 ` Robin H. Johnson
@ 2006-12-18 22:52 ` Yuri Vasilevski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Yuri Vasilevski @ 2006-12-18 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:28:22 -0800
"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:53:56PM -0600, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> > This will make the script a little bit slower, but it should not be
> > that hard to integrate.
> Please read the message that I sent as well. In specific, there is NO
> way we can gaurentee that the machine has an up to date copy of the
> tree
> - thus why we use CVS history directly.
Yes, sorry, my mistake. For some reason I assumed that on the CVS
server you also have the tree ready to use and in an unpacked form.
Yuri.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 15:33 ` Yuri Vasilevski
2006-12-18 16:38 ` Alec Warner
@ 2006-12-18 19:15 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-12-18 20:11 ` Philip Webb
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2006-12-18 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 681 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:33:59AM -0600, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> I think it should also include the Homepage(s) and Description of the
> packages so readers could easily check what that additions are all
> about. While I'm not that sure that additions date and probably who
> made the addition are that important for readers.
The homepage and description are inside ebuilds, whereas the
information presently is not taken from the ebuilds at all (rather from
the CVS history as I previously noted).
Sure it's doable, but it's a lot more work.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 19:15 ` Robin H. Johnson
@ 2006-12-18 20:11 ` Philip Webb
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Philip Webb @ 2006-12-18 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
061218 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:33:59AM -0600, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
>> It should also include the Homepage(s) and Description of the packages
>> so readers could easily check what that additions are all about.
> The homepage and description are inside ebuilds
> Sure it's doable, but it's a lot more work.
All anyone needs to do is 'eix <pkg-spec via clipboard>'.
I just checked the new 'app-editors/tea' that way.
--
========================,,============================================
SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb : purslow@chass.utoronto.ca
ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Centre for Urban & Community Studies
TRANSIT `-O----------O---' University of Toronto
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 15:02 ` [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC Chris Gianelloni
2006-12-18 15:33 ` Yuri Vasilevski
@ 2006-12-18 19:14 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-12-30 19:15 ` Paul de Vrieze
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2006-12-18 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 891 bytes --]
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:02:00AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> > from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
> OK. Here's a fun question for you...
> Is it possible to have a slightly modified version of this script run,
> and the output sent to gwn-feedback for inclusion in the GWN? This
> would make my life tremendously easier, since currently I have to
> completely reformat this by hand.
I'll just send you the CSV file that I script into the email, and you
can come up with your own reformatting into GuideML, esp. as I don't
have any easy way of resolving dev handle to their name for you.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 240 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23:59 UTC
2006-12-18 19:14 ` Robin H. Johnson
@ 2006-12-30 19:15 ` Paul de Vrieze
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Paul de Vrieze @ 2006-12-30 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1082 bytes --]
On Monday 18 December 2006 20:14, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:02:00AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> > > from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
> >
> > OK. Here's a fun question for you...
> > Is it possible to have a slightly modified version of this script run,
> > and the output sent to gwn-feedback for inclusion in the GWN? This
> > would make my life tremendously easier, since currently I have to
> > completely reformat this by hand.
>
> I'll just send you the CSV file that I script into the email, and you
> can come up with your own reformatting into GuideML, esp. as I don't
> have any easy way of resolving dev handle to their name for you.
Actually we have a ready made xslt script available. It is the template
named "fullname" in the util.xsl file.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread