From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GhYT4-0005tH-Ir for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 21:26:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA7LPNZH002911; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:25:23 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA7LKvBO013779 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:20:57 GMT Received: from [10.181.255.188] (unknown [67.151.143.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7CF64656 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 21:20:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November From: Seemant Kulleen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20061107203446.GB18340@superlupo.rechner> References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611061720.50442.vapier@gentoo.org> <20061106223839.GA6332@gentoo.org> <200611061748.34810.vapier@gentoo.org> <45502DEB.20404@gentoo.org> <20061107160048.GB21817@feynman.corp.halliburton.com> <20061107160958.1f1cf26c@snowdrop.home> <4550B9B4.9060008@gentoo.org> <20061107174728.064de822@snowdrop.home> <20061107203446.GB18340@superlupo.rechner> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Foundation Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 16:20:54 -0500 Message-Id: <1162934454.10073.3.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b83f2d08-48c7-4f90-bf14-e107cf064104 X-Archives-Hash: 0534973eb6026d4d77fcc8d0cd1c2851 On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 21:34 +0100, Wernfried Haas wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 05:47:28PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Along with the rest of the thread. Notice in particular how Joshua > > claims that Kurt has never justified using SPF, and how in replies he > > refuses to do so. > > Do you really care about Gentoo's SPF, or are you just on a vendetta > against klieber since you mention his name all the time? This isn't quite a fair attack, to be honest. It's funny how jaded we've become to any mail from Ciaran. In this case, he provided info without sarcastic remarks. And I believe the observation (made elsewhere) that SPF's existence on Gentoo's infrastructure has never actually been justified to the people it affects, namely the developers. > While we're at the whole email stuff, it seems you still sign your > emails with ciaranm@gentoo.org, which i personally find at least as > annoying as you find klie^WSPF. Silly silly, and it doesn't belong on the list. Please don't be part of the problem. -- Seemant Kulleen Developer, Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list