From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GhALe-0005Pv-Jb for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:41:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA6Je9js003774; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:40:09 GMT Received: from smtp01.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (smtp-out1.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net [70.43.63.18]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA6JYsXV028341 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:34:54 GMT Received: from [10.3.23.152] (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp01.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kA6JYppI027759 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:34:51 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <454DDAC3.4030208@gentoo.org> References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <200611050530.43128.vapier@gentoo.org> <454DBF5F.50408@gentoo.org> <200611050545.09640.vapier@gentoo.org> <454DC709.2000905@gentoo.org> <454DDAC3.4030208@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ht8KyRDAqjXLCSJGOq8V" Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:37:00 -0500 Message-Id: <1162841820.10506.42.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 X-Archives-Salt: 79bf8ee8-e3d6-4957-8831-1d027afa472b X-Archives-Hash: 9fd2870cc16ce445f6dadff2c041e75f --=-ht8KyRDAqjXLCSJGOq8V Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 13:36 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote: > Alin Nastac napsal(a): > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> On Sunday 05 November 2006 05:39, Alin Nastac wrote: > >> =20 > >>> Mike Frysinger wrote: > >>> =20 > >>>> that's nice, but again, why arent these being directed to infra ? > >>>> =20 > >>> It could be considered as organization policy, so I assumed council h= ad > >>> to be involved in this decision. > >>> =20 > >> it isnt ... so file a bug for infra > >> =20 > > done in bug 154120 . > >=20 >=20 > And WONTFIXed in 15 minutes. In that case, I'd like to resubmit it to > the council... :/ So because you didn't like the answer from the people responsible for this, you'd rather go over their heads and try to bring this up to the council, so we can override their decisions? Not bloody likely. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-ht8KyRDAqjXLCSJGOq8V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFT47ckT4lNIS36YERAn0AAJ9dH15E8yKx0kWT9jpuj5Vcku42JQCfTs0o khYk6NLTJAA7QUM63yzjXD8= =8TgU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ht8KyRDAqjXLCSJGOq8V-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list