From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GhAJr-0007zO-RK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:39:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA6JbcKb017705; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:37:38 GMT Received: from smtp02.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (smtp-out2.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net [70.43.63.19]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA6JVghL018267 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:31:42 GMT Received: from [10.3.23.152] (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp02.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kA6JVdAs014752 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 14:31:39 -0500 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <454DBB86.9060001@gentoo.org> References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> <1162719343.14498.35.camel@tuxhugger> <20061105095949.221e85ba@snowdrop.home> <454DBB86.9060001@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-kTGL0lXxVT+ocwCoBxhY" Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:33:46 -0500 Message-Id: <1162841626.10506.38.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 X-Archives-Salt: bd60f885-0c0d-4c9d-b2d4-fd169de2c46d X-Archives-Hash: 310b5d9b45bc31eb5063e7c87140168b --=-kTGL0lXxVT+ocwCoBxhY Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 02:23 -0800, David Shakaryan wrote: > This is not a question of opinion; this is one of consistency. All of > the lists are currently doing it a certain way, whilst -core seems to be > behaving differently. This is bound to cause confusion. As you > mentioned, we should be dealing with more important things. Why not > settle this once and for all, so we constantly don't have to spend time > having this useless argument? If people are really going to insist that we vote on this, then I propose we remove the headers from all of the lists. While we're at it, I'd like to propose we have Andrea flogged publicly at the town square at noon for not having the same opinion as everyone else. Damn free thinkers... --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-kTGL0lXxVT+ocwCoBxhY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFT44akT4lNIS36YERAjtPAJ9aFOcWhSiKKx7B2Il9+L1ZJNisNQCaAhu1 9hpayQrf0G022NirFb+I73k= =x0k2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-kTGL0lXxVT+ocwCoBxhY-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list