From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-18574-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1GgeSl-000394-9L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 09:38:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA59boWG007416; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 09:37:50 GMT Received: from theory.elixant5.com (66.32.232.72.reverse.layeredtech.com [72.232.32.66]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA59ZohE005012 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 09:35:51 GMT Received: from [207.215.252.49] (helo=[172.16.1.34]) by theory.elixant5.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.52) id 1GgePq-0001cX-1M for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 03:35:46 -0600 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November From: Peter Gordon <codergeek42@gentoo.org> To: Gentoo Dev ML <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> References: <20061101134037.6F126649AC@smtp.gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-IgZEOCexCgoGbvT5bOhw" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 01:35:43 -0800 Message-Id: <1162719343.14498.35.camel@tuxhugger> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 (2.8.1.1-3.fc6) X-Elixant-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Elixant-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-Elixant-MailScanner-SpamCheck: X-Elixant-MailScanner-From: codergeek42@gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - theory.elixant5.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gentoo.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Archives-Salt: f2543845-ee67-4d75-ad5c-dd9b77f9e1bb X-Archives-Hash: 649867e4c9f85abb8b425c1a01b6a30e --=-IgZEOCexCgoGbvT5bOhw Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 08:40 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole > Gentoo dev list to see. I have one item that I would like to see addressed in the next possible council meeting: The reply behavior of gentoo-core messages. What's happening is that gentoo-core appears to have no default Reply-To header set.=20 This issue I feel needs to be addressed for two major reasons: Firstly, with no explicit Reply-To address, most mail clients default to replying to the sender of the message. This means that, for people who use such clients must manually replace the To: address in their reply composition. Unfortunately, there have been prior instances of a dev accidentally replying to the -core list on -dev. This means that the conversation intended to stay private and internal to Gentoo suddenly is in the public eye and many archives. This will inevitably occur if such behavior is not resolved. Secondly, every other Gentoo mailing list that I am subscribed to (g-dev, g-devrel, g-gwn) adds a Reply-To header which instructs the dev's MUA to default to replying to the list address, rather than to the individual sender of the message to which they reply. Unfortunately, gentoo-core is the only list which does not follow this behavior.=20 I would appreciate the council voting on making this behavior consistent: Force gentoo-core to add this header, or remove it from the other mailing lists.=20 Thanks. --=20 Peter Gordon (codergeek42) Gentoo Forums Global Moderator GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/ --=-IgZEOCexCgoGbvT5bOhw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFTbBvQmjLev/BlHkRAt1KAKCogINVEjKdUljumRaW65NM12B2FgCdGRAj z8N1DVUhcw0b37ssAGPPuZQ= =aIFj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-IgZEOCexCgoGbvT5bOhw-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list