From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-18517-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1GfvSy-0008WI-Ja for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:36:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA39Z7UN009726; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:35:07 GMT Received: from smtp-6.masterhost.ru (smtp-6.masterhost.ru [83.222.24.106]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA39X3FG015652 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 09:33:03 GMT Received: (qmail 64383 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2006 09:32:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.10.146.236?) (admin@rcline.ru@212.118.59.3) by smtp1.masterhost.ru with SMTP; 3 Nov 2006 09:32:44 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] fixing up portage implicit RDEPEND behavior From: "Peter Volkov (pva)" <pva@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <454B014A.8070203@gentoo.org> References: <200611030229.46220.vapier@gentoo.org> <454B014A.8070203@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BanwDERuGVW8eBlk8Wri" Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 12:32:32 +0300 Message-Id: <1162546352.8060.45.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1.1 X-Archives-Salt: a9ab3713-8315-4cd6-89ba-2f0a5fd7b8c9 X-Archives-Hash: 8c15ba9349f2715438ef0f4adb314519 --=-BanwDERuGVW8eBlk8Wri Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2006-11-03 at 00:43 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > Also, some ebuilds will loose some implicit RDEPEND that they current > get from eclasses. Why? I suppose more logical solution is to adjoin DEPEND from ebuild and RDEPEND from eclass. Peter. --=-BanwDERuGVW8eBlk8Wri Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFSwywz6tlgEWSarMRAipdAJ9GQOiSr7gUCkWbGmUOCKQ9+SGaJQCfdHJ/ kt0w3Pil70Z/UfutqKwx/E0= =wiV8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-BanwDERuGVW8eBlk8Wri-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list