From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GVHOG-0007rq-SU for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:47:09 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k950jdKK002347; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 00:45:39 GMT Received: from smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k950gJv7021412 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 00:42:19 GMT Received: from [10.3.23.152] (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k950iOnM006182 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:44:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <20061004070014.843d851d.tcort@gentoo.org> <45239C82.2050502@gentoo.org> <1159972037.10543.28.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <4523F47F.2070502@gentoo.org> <452409B0.5060101@gentoo.org> <1159997107.10543.84.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-eyZ04Qu/sua3NX/DxIsR" Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:42:13 -0400 Message-Id: <1160008934.20355.1.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 X-Archives-Salt: f7124ee0-66f1-4b40-846c-01d9e18661db X-Archives-Hash: f78d1c8b345b1967c08e0654d0ee25ac --=-eyZ04Qu/sua3NX/DxIsR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 17:43 -0400, Mike Pagano wrote: > How about something in the "planet" format that where each group > reporting status could do so at their schedule when they feel an > update is necessary or warrented. >=20 > Then users could just read the website for the latest status updates. >=20 > There are a few "hot" items many people are interested in such as kde > or gnome stablization, for example. A simple line like "Don't expect > KDE 5.0 to go stable before the end of the year" provides transparency > and a bit of communication to the user community. Again, there's nothing wrong with that, but that isn't so much the sort of thing where the council is concerned. I was speaking more of long-term and short-term projects that directly affect the developers. I'm seeking more to improve inter-project communication, rather than developer-user communications. It isn't that I don't think dev-user communications are important, it is just that I don't see it as one of Gentoo's "problems" currently. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-eyZ04Qu/sua3NX/DxIsR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFJFTlkT4lNIS36YERAljzAJ9/l+rLyeD7/VH8r4/Z6Y2q7vVYaACfWnli B73fXznNhj0yyPAjk33WuUk= =078i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-eyZ04Qu/sua3NX/DxIsR-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list