From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GUNVA-0002Wq-Et for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:06:32 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k92D52di028767; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:05:02 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k92D1lRp032401 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:01:48 GMT Received: from [10.3.23.152] (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k92D2sZU018796 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:02:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] OT noise (Was: Profile masking and profiles package.mask) From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200610021450.06366@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> References: <200609300640.14616@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <451EA32A.50400@gentoo.org> <1159792480.10562.7.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <200610021450.06366@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9Z3oQdMSPfFmHJF7+onk" Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:01:59 -0400 Message-Id: <1159794119.10562.10.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 X-Archives-Salt: d18004a1-d72f-4cf4-85d6-6437e09fd56c X-Archives-Hash: 73f7dc9f3246bebeae9959a05205914b --=-9Z3oQdMSPfFmHJF7+onk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 14:50 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > just wanted to be sure if this was the case (and having something to quot= e if=20 > something breaks when the behaviour is switched ;) happens too often not = to=20 > consider this, too). Yeah. It would be nice if we had some good way of getting this sort of information out to the developers. All too often we have behavior changes that people don't know about. I know that it has been suggested a few times before, but what do people think about the possibility of some sort of "-dev-announce" list or something to put useful non-discussion information such as this, with reply-to set to this list? --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation --=-9Z3oQdMSPfFmHJF7+onk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFIQ3HkT4lNIS36YERAtOuAKDCFTBmqGpMev2+CLQ9tk9vobKAOgCfSnId tYuOFCWVLpje8qetKZpp6a0= =ZS/h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9Z3oQdMSPfFmHJF7+onk-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list