From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GMoOk-000788-W9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:12:39 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k8BGB1gg016403; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:11:01 GMT Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8BG7w6x004543 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:07:58 GMT Received: from [172.23.170.145] (helo=anti-virus03-08) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GMoKE-0004ju-BX for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:07:58 +0100 Received: from [82.46.45.60] (helo=gaspode) by asmtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GMoKD-0004XE-G6 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:07:57 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-apps/drupal From: Christel Dahlskjaer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <45057A2E.6020605@gentoo.org> References: <1157833505.17086.7.camel@gaspode> <45055C7C.6090003@gentoo.org> <45057A2E.6020605@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:07:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1157994476.14329.9.camel@gaspode> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 324ea340-8ec2-475f-bf86-dd0bc49988b2 X-Archives-Hash: d109d9b2aba2b3e064c56e5c7dfb38c5 On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 11:01 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > Stuart Herbert wrote: > > On 9/11/06, Jakub Moc wrote: > >> Uhm, web-apps has been CCed on the bug since the beginning. Last time I > >> asked, noone wanted to touch the FUBARed ebuild, IIRC. :) > > > > The package was masked without Christel (on behalf of QA) posting an > > advance warning of their actions. That's not trying to work together. > > It's not trying to work with existing teams. > > So file a complaint; once again the -dev list shouldn't be for > complaining about how people {suck,don't follow policy} I actually second Stuart on this one, I should have contacted web-apps and believe that we should make it procedure to do so in the future. That was my mistake entirely. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list