From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJxxs-0006gh-Ik for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 19:49:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k83JliGt030309; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:47:44 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (66-191-187-123.dhcp.gnvl.sc.charter.com [66.191.187.123]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k83JjhRe013608 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 19:45:44 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00F92480FC for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32014-20 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:41:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vertigo.twi-31o2.org (vertigo.twi-31o2.org [192.168.0.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83955248066 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:41:30 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: References: <44F95E3E.9000708@gentoo.org> <44F96559.6010003@gentoo.org> <44F96881.90806@gentoo.org> <44F98E43.5040307@gentoo.org> <44FA15D1.2020209@gentoo.org> <44FAE883.8090107@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-lwfzX0MIUS9/oknhnXIL" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 15:43:04 -0400 Message-Id: <1157312584.13936.24.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org X-Archives-Salt: f7f5f539-8482-4aec-a90d-152bb3fefa76 X-Archives-Hash: 69e86c15f5d7e2f1cae8c853ce9f167b --=-lwfzX0MIUS9/oknhnXIL Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 17:40 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: > On 9/3/06, Alec Warner wrote: > > in the end > > GCC-4.1 going stable is up to releng and arch teams (heck it doesn't > > technically have to go stable on all arches). So who "screwed up" in > > this case? >=20 > Well, for a package like PHP, the package maintainers take > responsibility for ensuring that there are useful and adequate > announcements up front. >=20 > GCC I suspect is surrounded by more confusion. Either the package > maintainers or the arch teams could have made an announcement giving > fair warning; alas, neither did. It was in the GWN. Twice. Funny enough, Donnie complained that I put the same information in two GWN's and I explained that no matter, what, there would be people bitching. You've proven it. There's only so many times you can tell someone the *exact* same thing before it gets redundant. If you missed the announcement, I'm sorry to hear it, but I'm not apologizing for your perception that we didn't get the word out. We did. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-lwfzX0MIUS9/oknhnXIL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBE+zBIkT4lNIS36YERAgauAKCFephrsl8iSIOia+BnTvEt2NDtwQCghQ3w iOdPiGUe4TRtm/+11Za+9Gs= =zgDI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-lwfzX0MIUS9/oknhnXIL-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list