From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GGL0o-0006Vw-I3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:37:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k7OJYjOP009041; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:34:45 GMT Received: from mail.pcsrvc.com (webmail.pcsrvc.com [24.225.5.124]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7OJVO8h014244 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:31:24 GMT Received: from homer (linux.homershut.net [24.225.5.125]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pcsrvc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6704AD25E9 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:31:23 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet From: Homer Parker To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <44EDEC72.8030207@gentoo.org> References: <44ECF00D.7050107@gentoo.org> <44EDDE39.6030604@gentoo.org> <44EDE498.70909@gentoo.org> <200608242003.48043.jaervosz@gentoo.org> <44EDEC72.8030207@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:31:22 -0500 Message-Id: <1156447883.6571.32.camel@homer> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c59f1d25-3062-4ed4-9137-3e7b7ca8595f X-Archives-Hash: 46fb589bd63078af5c0ee5cb4a7e4923 On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 13:14 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: > For the record, I was waiting for those folks to come to us to resolve > it. Last I knew we had a partial resolution with the parties involved, > but shortly after that they just stopped pursing it. I figured if it > was > that important to them, they'd get back with us. So I'm not sure what > happened to that exactly. If they weren't pursing it anymore, I didn't > see the point in us pursing it since they were the ones requesting > it. It is important, and still on my todo list. I'm still awaiting the anon-cvs/svn/whatever to be finished before taking on the next part. Not trying to reopen the whole can of worms at them moment, but.. As for partial resolution, the discussion degenerated to having those saying it would cause classes of devs vs those saying they aren't devs and shouldn't have @g.o addresses from what I remember. I'll have to go re-read the thread to be sure. -- Homer Parker -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list