From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8j8A-0002vw-D7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 19:45:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k73JiNjV007297; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:44:23 GMT Received: from castor.warande.net (castor.sshunet.nl [145.97.192.41]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k73JgNKT005900 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:42:23 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by castor.warande.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1B557C009 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:22:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from castor.warande.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (castor [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07021-01 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:22:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rivendell (216pc222.sshunet.nl [145.97.222.216]) by castor.warande.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:22:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sunrise contemplations From: foser To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <44D077D8.3030907@gentoo.org> References: <1154366720.17142.126.camel@rivendell> <44D077D8.3030907@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:22:13 +0200 Message-Id: <1154632933.16246.16.camel@rivendell> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at sshunet.nl X-Archives-Salt: 5c092921-04c6-416f-a2ba-44d870f9a9e2 X-Archives-Hash: b1bba334f8f70eac829c19d66eef25a1 On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 12:00 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > So you can create projects by creating a directory in > gentoo/xml/htdocs/proj/en, you don't have to announce it (but it's > polite to do so), and it may well conflict with other projects, that's okay. > > You can't blame them for following the right rule. You can blame the > rule, though. I deliberately added '(GLEP?)' with question mark because I know projects in general do not fit the GLEP structure. However, in this case the project has potentially the kind of impact on the tree and other developers that discussing it beforehand would've been the right thing to do. The way the announcement was written makes me think the developers involved in the project were well aware of this. It seems to me creating a project is now officially a loophole to do as you please under the umbrella of Gentoo. - Marinus -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list