From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G8Zp5-0003Yi-IM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:48:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k739mBUv032432; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:48:11 GMT Received: from crossford.net (dsl-62-3-120-141.zen.co.uk [62.3.120.141]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k739kJrw012500 for ; Thu, 3 Aug 2006 09:46:20 GMT Received: (qmail 13365 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2006 10:46:19 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO spike) (192.168.100.18) by 192.168.10.10 with SMTP; 3 Aug 2006 10:46:19 +0100 Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:46:22 +0100 From: Roy Bamford Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise resumed again (was Resignation) To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <200608020224.25861.carlo@gentoo.org> <20060802013922.GA8912@seldon> <200608022005.16242.carlo@gentoo.org> <20060803025651.GA13458@seldon> <44D16D08.7070808@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <44D16D08.7070808@gentoo.org> (from ramereth@gentoo.org on Thu Aug 3 04:27:04 2006) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.13 Message-Id: <1154598382l.9882l.1l@spike> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id k739kJrw012500 X-Archives-Salt: a16b5ab4-7d76-4834-9588-74334f9f1ba3 X-Archives-Hash: d102df411086432ec2b2bdadd0fb4f13 On 2006.08.03 04:27, Lance Albertson wrote: [snip] > There's a good chance that a package in the regular tree will link > against a package from sunrise, the user will have no idea or forget > that they installed that app from sunrise (and the dep exists), and a > bug arises. [snip] > > Anyways, I've been trying to keep quiet on this issue and decided I > could interject here :) > > Cheers- > > -- > Lance Albertson > Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager > > --- > GPG Public Key: > Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 > > ramereth/irc.freenode.net > How can that happen ? Devs working on the regular tree should not have any third party overlays installed in the test environment so their ebuild should fail testing because it can't resolve the dependancy lurking in the overlay. What an I missing ? Regards, Roy Bamford -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list