From: Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category: net-voip
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:18:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1153246717.31239.28.camel@onyx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9ip0l$m89$1@sea.gmane.org>
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 15:51 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
> > Creation of a new categories is fine. pkg moves are bad.
> > See the countless other posting on this subject of why pkg
> > moves are bad.
> yeah new packages is my primary concern.
>
> >> Any objections, problems with the plan, comments?
> >
> > Sure I'll step up and say I object to the part of your plan which
> > involves a shitton of pkgmoves. Moving pkgs from existing categories
> > into another category causes numerous problems that portage can't solve
> > as easy as the rest of us might think so please just don't do that
> > part. I've got no objection to the creation of a new category for *new*
> > packages.
>
> I talked with you in IRC about this more. We will do the package moves only
> when a bump occurs and will make sure that stable as well as ~arch get an
> updated ebuild.
Sweet/Thanks that works and provides a clear path to upgrade/bump.
--
Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-18 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-18 12:53 [gentoo-dev] New category: net-voip Stefan Schweizer
2006-07-18 13:34 ` Ned Ludd
2006-07-18 13:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Stefan Schweizer
2006-07-18 18:18 ` Ned Ludd [this message]
2006-07-18 14:15 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2006-07-18 18:17 ` Ned Ludd
2006-07-18 20:43 ` Ciaran McCreesh
[not found] ` <200607181739.49727.vapier@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <1153321851.6243.20.camel@onyx>
2006-07-19 16:10 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-07-22 11:29 ` Ned Ludd
2006-07-22 11:42 ` Jakub Moc
2006-07-22 11:57 ` Simon Stelling
2006-07-23 11:16 ` Stuart Herbert
2006-07-19 18:22 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
[not found] ` <20060718211822.379c65e1@c1358217.kevquinn.com>
2006-07-18 20:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2006-07-19 6:57 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-07-19 16:15 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-07-20 7:05 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-07-20 7:37 ` Brian Harring
2006-07-20 18:41 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-07-20 20:24 ` Brian Harring
2006-07-20 23:17 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-07-20 23:26 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-07-22 9:45 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-07-20 16:27 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-07-21 7:44 ` Stuart Herbert
2006-07-21 8:05 ` Brian Harring
2006-07-21 14:49 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-07-22 16:04 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-07-22 20:35 ` Brian Harring
2006-07-24 12:43 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-07-22 20:42 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-07-24 12:42 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-07-23 11:19 ` Stuart Herbert
2006-07-24 12:47 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-07-24 13:23 ` Brian Harring
2006-07-24 15:50 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2006-07-24 16:30 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-07-24 12:53 ` Jakub Moc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1153246717.31239.28.camel@onyx \
--to=solar@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox