From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1G1BQ2-000355-OL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:20:35 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k6E0Ijjx024603; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:18:45 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k6E0D94C028444 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:13:09 GMT Received: from [192.168.0.242] (ip70-189-85-100.ok.ok.cox.net [70.189.85.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B711A645C8 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] From: Steev Klimaszewski To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <782b5430607131702g6c925d09s8fed2e62fb343563@mail.gmail.com> References: <782b5430607131702g6c925d09s8fed2e62fb343563@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:13:03 -0500 Message-Id: <1152835983.26625.0.camel@sigma.crm.s4f.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k6E0Ijll024603 X-Archives-Salt: c42446b8-dcc3-4a1b-b626-5ffb6b76d13f X-Archives-Hash: 84f537c81f29f9283d0d899c220169eb On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 01:02 +0100, Ser Gio wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:19:44 +0200 > Jakub Moc wrote: >=20 > > Ser Gio wrote: > > > Hello, > > >=20 > > > Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild=20 > > > doesn't look like it's using it. > > >=20 > > > thanks, > > > S=C3=A9rgio > >=20 > > Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it. >=20 > Yes, i noticed that. But, for the enduser, the X flag in gtk+ is > useless right? So, is it a bug?=20 >=20 > Regards, > S=C3=A9rgio Martins Actually, as of 2.10, gtk+ CAN be built without X and using the framebuffer, so you can build gtk+ apps against the framebuffer (using them, is another story... although I hear GIMP works) so having it there isn't necessarily useless. --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list