From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FzAy8-0007or-AS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:27:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k68BPjma010057; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:25:45 GMT Received: from skinny.southernlinux.net (ns2.rednecks.net [64.192.52.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k68BMkLq016575 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 11:22:46 GMT Received: (qmail 15135 invoked by uid 210); 8 Jul 2006 07:21:22 -0400 Received: from 64.192.55.166 by skinny (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88.2/1589. f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(64.192.55.166):. Processed in 0.064118 secs); 08 Jul 2006 11:21:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.99.99.11?) (64.192.55.166) by 0 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2006 07:21:21 -0400 Subject: Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags) From: Ned Ludd To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <925fa7670607071318w3052844ch54a3ba94ea40cbf@mail.gmail.com> References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <44AD6C8E.8060300@gentoo.org> <20060706201420.GA3845@gentoo.org> <200607061944.34690.vapier@gentoo.org> <20060707054615.GA3257@gentoo.org> <20060707160009.1c373aea@c1358217.kevquinn.com> <20060707165304.GA3255@gentoo.org> <1152294903.8423.20.camel@onyx> <925fa7670607071318w3052844ch54a3ba94ea40cbf@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:22:41 -0400 Message-Id: <1152357762.27292.9.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0877f470-3277-4781-a71a-b11e68ba553a X-Archives-Hash: 3dae8c75ea0e3c61e1777de2e70af456 On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 15:18 -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote: > On 7/7/06, Ned Ludd wrote: > > You want a pure 100% > > vanilla(POS) non working toolchain then go download it and > > compile it yourself. You will soon see why things exist the way > > they do.. > > LFS has always been based on a > "vanilla" toolchain. Never ran into issues. Of course, we do apply > upstream patches when needed. They patch gcc as needed also. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs/ -- Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list