From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fzd3M-0005L5-LB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2006 17:26:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k69HPrB6030022; Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:25:53 GMT Received: from tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.184]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k69HNUxU011495 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2006 17:23:31 GMT Received: from TesterBox.tester.ca ([65.93.53.221]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060709172330.RESI10262.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@TesterBox.tester.ca> for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2006 13:23:30 -0400 Received: by TesterBox.tester.ca (Postfix, from userid 207) id 3F4C9980096; Sun, 9 Jul 2006 13:22:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by TesterBox.tester.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7486E98061F; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:35:29 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags From: Olivier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cr=EAte?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20060706134939.6ecd7758@snowdrop.home> References: <200607061252.33028@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060706131905.3ba12b49@snowdrop.home> <200607061429.39803@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <20060706134939.6ecd7758@snowdrop.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nhc8uunzV2dJfFeSj+pB" Organization: Gentoo Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:35:28 -0400 Message-Id: <1152192928.9214.7.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 X-Archives-Salt: 652d7d72-72c4-458b-8793-3d5e0bccbd67 X-Archives-Hash: 91008871c5bc883931583af582d823ba --=-nhc8uunzV2dJfFeSj+pB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2006-06-07 at 13:49 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 14:29:39 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=F2" > wrote: > | On Thursday 06 July 2006 14:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > Sounds rather flaky and unreliable... > | Sounds rather vague and without arguments. >=20 > Well, you're assuming that > a) everyone's using a C compiler, If you're on Gentoo, I sure hope you have a C compiler > b) that gcc has the slightest clue what it's doing, Again, if you've compiled your whole system with gcc, I guess its a safe bet > c) that the user has no problem using nasty hacks to regain control, Since when is setting your -march/-mnosse/-mnommx/-mno3dnow a nasty hack? > d) that this information is only needed at compile time, I agree this is a problem.. > e) that various gcc internal definitions won't change...=20 We can always change the eclass and check the GCC version if that happens. --=20 Olivier Cr=EAte tester@gentoo.org --=-nhc8uunzV2dJfFeSj+pB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBErRGgHTiOWk7ZorsRAilHAJ9vhioj5JU3ppkMB4Mb9GIvoygahACeLC1C k6+Vw+QPH4TpcfLLNw6yByk= =u8kG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nhc8uunzV2dJfFeSj+pB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list