From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fy7fb-0004VU-ON for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:44:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k65Dcaje001988; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 13:38:36 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k65DV2sx019107 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 13:31:03 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k65DVUM6013560 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:31:30 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:28:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] arch-cruft in use.mask makes me angry From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200607042154.22942.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <200607042154.22942.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tYD5nBlfhstitOKJWjVC" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:28:34 -0400 Message-Id: <1152106115.21775.41.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 X-Archives-Salt: ac72ec74-6175-4ff4-83a9-60323e564d2f X-Archives-Hash: fa9030f7209a2ed8110e455feb643490 --=-tYD5nBlfhstitOKJWjVC Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 21:54 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > can someone remind me why our arch USE flags are in an "opt-out" system r= ather=20 > than "opt-in" ? instead of adding things like: > dmi > icc > mmx > svga > ... >=20 > to every non-x86 profile, why dont we mask these things in base/use.mask = and=20 > then un-mask them in default-linux/x86 ? doesnt that make more sense ? Absolutely. Feel free to do it. I know x86 won't mind. If you have a complete list, I can do it, if you don't have time. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-tYD5nBlfhstitOKJWjVC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEq76CkT4lNIS36YERArC6AKCRJuOwVjfzoYCJAyWgUxD9mM/rHACfTPw0 5T76cnhNU8EH9kfOeTc4Fqc= =EFij -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tYD5nBlfhstitOKJWjVC-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list