From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-14287-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1FuLY7-0003UF-T0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 03:44:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with SMTP id k5P3fpNL032160; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 03:41:51 GMT Received: from skinny.southernlinux.net (ns2.rednecks.net [64.192.52.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5P3X12E027675 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Jun 2006 03:33:02 GMT Received: (qmail 13052 invoked by uid 210); 24 Jun 2006 23:32:10 -0400 Received: from 64.192.55.166 by skinny (envelope-from <solar@gentoo.org>, uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.88.2/1562. f-prot: 4.4.2/3.14.11. spamassassin: 3.1.0. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(64.192.55.166):. Processed in 0.062706 secs); 25 Jun 2006 03:32:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.99.99.11?) (64.192.55.166) by 0 with SMTP; 24 Jun 2006 23:32:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-dev-announce list From: Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <449DFDD1.1090506@gentoo.org> References: <449DFDD1.1090506@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:32:58 -0400 Message-Id: <1151206378.29095.32.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c7feb89e-764f-47b9-a215-83da1e9b975e X-Archives-Hash: 60f0de8d400e9d5d0a4a989584ebf3eb On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 20:06 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once > again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise > ratio over the past year or two, and it's difficult to dig out the stuff > that's truly required reading. > > I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decisions be posted to > a separate, moderated (or restricted posting) gentoo-dev-announce list > to ensure that no developers lose track of what really matters. > Hopefully, this will also help to give more focus to discussions on > gentoo-dev because the goal will be to get a real decision to send to > gentoo-dev-announce. I would be in favor of a gentoo-dev-announce list if it allowed me to unsubscribe from this list. -- Ned Ludd <solar@gentoo.org> Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list