From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FooxH-00064X-4l for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 21:55:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59Ll68H031237; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:47:06 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59LSS4d020541 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:28:28 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k59LSi43002541 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:28:44 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:26:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4489BA11.5010702@gentoo.org> References: <44894E7C.5070302@gentoo.org> <1149872786.22473.38.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <200606091955.17280.peper@aster.pl> <4489BA11.5010702@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-B8Fw/mgMByEEsQQxh69V" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:26:12 -0400 Message-Id: <1149888372.22473.183.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Archives-Salt: b61cc57a-27a0-4a88-a127-1487b9029540 X-Archives-Hash: ed8be582f9725dc6403dcd16c2d10b4a --=-B8Fw/mgMByEEsQQxh69V Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 20:12 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > Peper wrote: > >>> well. A couple of examples: > >>> > >>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D122500 > >> And again, you use my project of an example. Perhaps you should try > >> looking at something that actually supports your argument? > >=20 > > I think it's an example of how user-friendly is bugzilla... >=20 > Yeah, exactly... I don't understand where did this idea of me using > someone else's own project against himself came from in the first place. > *confused* >=20 > I've merely posted a few examples illustrating that bugzilla and > attachments suck big time for new ebuilds' development. Or, why did you > switch vmware-server work to SVN if bugzilla is *the* place for all > this? Apparently it's not all that great, otherwise you wouldn't have > done that. #1. *I* (as the vmware team) didn't do it, the (then) user who posted the package did #2. We also built it up as the entire vmware overlay... it had little to do with any limitations in bugzilla, and more to do with my already-established desires to make maintaining vmware-* easier This really is a case of you not knowing what the actual facts were in regards to the situation, yet pointing it out as some kind of corroborating evidence for your argument. This is definitely not the case. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-B8Fw/mgMByEEsQQxh69V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEied0kT4lNIS36YERAjjyAJ9QVW/VVskvOBvYdVPwPmcQJp0f9gCggOH1 X1VZv1upBnBphgktA4UL05s= =zMMb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-B8Fw/mgMByEEsQQxh69V-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list