From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fooc4-00042P-1F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 21:33:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59LP0sK013338; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:25:00 GMT Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59LHBLb006747 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 21:17:12 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k59LHPOo030131 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:17:25 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:14:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] client+server packages - build which one? From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200606091622.25592.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <200606091410.51183.uberlord@gentoo.org> <200606091743.40901.uberlord@gentoo.org> <1149879857.22473.82.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <200606091622.25592.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qi9UXYUnWG1n4PM0n4G7" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:14:53 -0400 Message-Id: <1149887693.22473.173.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Archives-Salt: b555563c-d127-4ce4-ab1c-047c56bf8bc7 X-Archives-Hash: 1ba7256cd87fe4feca6853a66aa3a640 --=-qi9UXYUnWG1n4PM0n4G7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 16:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 09 June 2006 15:04, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 17:43 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > > > On Friday 09 June 2006 14:10, Roy Marples wrote: > > > > Some packages provide both a client and a server. As such, users > > > > usually only want one or the other - and rarely both. > > > > > > Thanks to wolf31o2 for pointing out that current policy dictates that= we > > > install both by default and the minimal USE flag should be used to st= op > > > server only compoment from installing. > > > > Not policy (I don't think) but current accepted practice. > > > > Should this become a policy? >=20 > i dont think it should ... minimal has a very floating definition and var= ies=20 > widely based on the package See my RFC for how this is handled. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-qi9UXYUnWG1n4PM0n4G7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEieTNkT4lNIS36YERAjAWAKCVLtYZE1aeTldnFgi78+H7+s7EkACfWgV2 hX5l3s3VRA/6Z+y81Mn95Uc= =NJg+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-qi9UXYUnWG1n4PM0n4G7-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list