From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FomPn-0002X6-Ct for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:13:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59JC3oe006716; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 19:12:03 GMT Received: from smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59J6X6s011294 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 19:06:34 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k59J71ow015061 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:07:02 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:04:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] client+server packages - build which one? From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200606091743.40901.uberlord@gentoo.org> References: <200606091410.51183.uberlord@gentoo.org> <200606091743.40901.uberlord@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-2WQHnayAv+uUlkB4p1IQ" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:04:16 -0400 Message-Id: <1149879857.22473.82.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Archives-Salt: 40230a90-df5f-41a1-a749-8f67b92fdf7f X-Archives-Hash: 7bf4f422739d62c750b09f19a8d589e7 --=-2WQHnayAv+uUlkB4p1IQ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 17:43 +0100, Roy Marples wrote: > On Friday 09 June 2006 14:10, Roy Marples wrote: > > Some packages provide both a client and a server. As such, users usuall= y > > only want one or the other - and rarely both. > > >=20 > Thanks to wolf31o2 for pointing out that current policy dictates that we=20 > install both by default and the minimal USE flag should be used to stop=20 > server only compoment from installing. Not policy (I don't think) but current accepted practice. Should this become a policy? --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-2WQHnayAv+uUlkB4p1IQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEicYwkT4lNIS36YERArbdAJ4qfS72M28XJucBp35pFQ7RjJrVXACfSdWI zuus1N6svgQpooTh6C1uv8I= =CCE3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-2WQHnayAv+uUlkB4p1IQ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list