From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FokZq-0002CM-H7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:15:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k59HCcLn014685; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:12:38 GMT Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k59H8g2t016240 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 17:08:43 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k59H8qW8016943 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:08:53 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 9 Jun 2006 13:06:27 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <44894E7C.5070302@gentoo.org> References: <44887368.9030302@gentoo.org> <1149803837.19443.101.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <4488A4F3.5060908@gentoo.org> <1149811589.19102.23.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> <1149841698.9743.20.camel@localhost> <1149847297.19408.14.camel@capella.catmur.co.uk> <44894E7C.5070302@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6ruqI67htBft5scChyK8" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 13:06:25 -0400 Message-Id: <1149872786.22473.38.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Archives-Salt: 70c05fcc-e315-43cd-8d82-4aef219ea418 X-Archives-Hash: 81b75bf9267483e4d379aae0128791bb --=-6ruqI67htBft5scChyK8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 12:33 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > well. A couple of examples: >=20 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D122500 And again, you use my project of an example. Perhaps you should try looking at something that actually supports your argument? A subversion repository was built for this. However, if you took the 3 seconds to *look* at the repository, you would see that it is actually an overlay for *all* of the vmware stuff. Then again, I guess it is just easier to ignore the facts and use things as you wish in an attempt to strengthen a weak argument. Of course, this is also an example of how a repository with an actual defined goal can bring on developers, since Mike is now a developer and a part of the VMware team. So again, I thank you for strengthening my position, while attempting to support your own. If you keep this up, I won't even have to reply anymore. ;] --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-6ruqI67htBft5scChyK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEiaqQkT4lNIS36YERAsK+AJ4+KmqsAu/XF4WB/d9bS2oTXqvZgACdEFoI ezPMocSzKJVHv8I+P7qUJB0= =rAu+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6ruqI67htBft5scChyK8-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list