From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FoQkj-0003sv-Gk for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:05:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k58JxZ36008183; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 19:59:35 GMT Received: from smtp-7.masterhost.ru (smtp-7.masterhost.ru [83.222.24.107]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k58JqrIE023717 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 19:52:53 GMT Received: (qmail 48379 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2006 19:52:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (admin@rcline.ru@80.86.252.151) by smtp1.masterhost.ru with SMTP; 8 Jun 2006 19:52:53 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification From: "Peter Volkov (pva)" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20060608192004.GC6526@osgiliath> References: <44887368.9030302@gentoo.org> <20060608192004.GC6526@osgiliath> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gjRI05K7JlTFu9H4OkDF" Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 23:52:50 +0400 Message-Id: <1149796370.16025.21.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Archives-Salt: 9a3116dc-02d6-4c0b-928d-e165ed793249 X-Archives-Hash: ed4ca442722f0607031706995a1d7e1f --=-gjRI05K7JlTFu9H4OkDF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 2006-06-08 at 21:20 +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrot= e: > It's not a "normal" overlay as I see it. You've promoted it to be an > official overlay. The difference is huge in my opinion. IMO such overlay should be official! Why not to keep all (partially) broken ebuilds in one place? This is the same story as with German gentoo forum that is outside gentoo.org and thus none of devs wanted to keep eyes there, so forum became much less useful. Another problem with BMG is that it is gnome oriented, as cleary stated on About page and thus I never thought that my, fex, www-apps could be there. > > As already mentioned at 1), it is an overlay. The devs on sunrise do > > keep an eye on it and all ebuilds do have to pass at least repoman and > > some basic QA checks (currently done when porting them from bugs.g.o) s= o > > that they don't do some rm -rf / thing. >=20 > Will you also review the code each and every ebuild pull down over the > internet? And that is really exciting moment. :) The main difference between such overlay and wiki is that reading text never does `rm -rf /`. How can one stop such jokes? I think if this problem will be solved such overlay should be. Peter. --=-gjRI05K7JlTFu9H4OkDF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEiIARz6tlgEWSarMRAhjbAJ9jtW9VvU8FDYo9J1yZYKbFweVR4wCeLt0H 0hepTnqdiGxKzbe9MguK1po= =6AQg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gjRI05K7JlTFu9H4OkDF-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list