From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FoLHO-0006u9-8f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:14:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k58EBhtY029205; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:11:43 GMT Received: from mail01.emarketsouth.com (mail01.emarketsouth.com [208.247.233.6]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k58E64n8014639 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:06:05 GMT Received: (qmail 28141 invoked by uid 399); 8 Jun 2006 14:09:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO onyx) (64.192.54.4) by mail01.emarketsouth.com with SMTP; 8 Jun 2006 14:09:37 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion + 1 From: Ned Ludd To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <448828FA.9010808@gentoo.org> References: <20060607151325.GA27076@nightcrawler> <1149717321.25264.4.camel@localhost> <44875D48.3030203@gentoo.org> <200606080607.29659.vapier@gentoo.org> <448800C3.5080807@gentoo.org> <1149773073.31288.16.camel@onyx> <448828FA.9010808@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 10:06:03 -0400 Message-Id: <1149775563.19017.27.camel@onyx> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4910e228-e06c-4e94-9b85-d074f8860a65 X-Archives-Hash: 9c82dfb3d6083c29123da2ecc6dfaa4a On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 09:41 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > Ned Ludd wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 06:49 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > > > >>Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > >>>On Wednesday 07 June 2006 19:12, Alec Warner wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>I would be more concerned with convincing the rest of the developers. > >>>>adding crap in base profile.bashrc will affect 99% of users, so it > >>>>better be friggin correct and useful, otherwise you will piss a ton of > >>>>people off. > >>> > >>> > >>>versus the people who are really annoyed that such support hasnt yet been > >>>integrated into portage proper ? > >>> > >>>yes, from the portage side of things, it may be a pita to implement > >>>per-package env ... but from the user side of things, it's a huge help > >>>-mike > >> > >>My e-mail was basically worded as to say "Solar paste your crap to this > >>ML." > > > > > > Alright... > > > > tail -n 6 /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/profile.bashrc > > > #for conf in ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do > > # if [[ -r /etc/portage/env/$CATEGORY/${conf} ]]; then > > # . /etc/portage/env/$CATEGORY/${conf} > > # break > > # fi > > #done > > Ideas on multipile sources? > > Aka, I want all these env things enable for kde-base/* but for > kde-base/foo -for conf in ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do +for conf in default ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do Call it 'default' ? > I want extra stuff ( or to negate things ), it looks like > this only sources things once? yep. > Could we define a stacking order here and let them stack? Could remove the break; > >> Is there any reason you need package.env in portage proper as > >>opposed to bashrc? > > > > > > Nope.. bashrc is the only way to access the variables in a way that > > is the most friendly to the bash side of things. > > > -- Ned Ludd Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list