From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FisIJ-0005GB-8y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 12:16:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4OCEUcj023121; Wed, 24 May 2006 12:14:30 GMT Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org (66-191-187-123.dhcp.gnvl.sc.charter.com [66.191.187.123]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4OC7dcX032387 for ; Wed, 24 May 2006 12:07:39 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABCB24804E for ; Wed, 24 May 2006 08:05:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.twi-31o2.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gravity.twi-31o2.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29802-19 for ; Wed, 24 May 2006 08:05:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vertigo.twi-31o2.org (vertigo.twi-31o2.org [192.168.0.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.twi-31o2.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E894524804D for ; Wed, 24 May 2006 08:05:44 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Security/QA Spring Cleaning From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4473DCE4.3080106@gentoo.org> References: <1148266942.19708.90.camel@localhost> <1148415750.11998.34.camel@onyx> <1148417466.18445.16.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20060523210620.GE14671@nightcrawler> <1148420769.18445.20.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20060523220514.GF14671@nightcrawler> <1148423071.18445.24.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <20060523223638.GG14671@nightcrawler> <4473DCE4.3080106@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8p4F5jbD6aMkejQeEKFn" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 08:06:30 -0400 Message-Id: <1148472390.11657.4.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at twi-31o2.org X-Archives-Salt: e10251c7-43d8-47ed-b390-db287b2bb708 X-Archives-Hash: 287337c34b7337ee26bacd0e329eda39 --=-8p4F5jbD6aMkejQeEKFn Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 00:11 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote: > My opinion is "snap, crackle, and pop"... let the tree break. But better > yet... figure out what depends on package X <=3D1.0 and p.mask it. Umm... anything that depends on the package in question *should* be getting masked. There's no opinion to it. Breaking the tree is a definite no-no. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-8p4F5jbD6aMkejQeEKFn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEdExGkT4lNIS36YERAiNiAJ98C6Rs+Wd96B4u5OAr8EjIuCtLjACfX3NU 3LaSoanjfsI2UXswhpPqvnI= =Buyn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8p4F5jbD6aMkejQeEKFn-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list