From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FgNRY-0004Jy-AE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:56:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4HEu6J4029875; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:56:06 GMT Received: from smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4HEqjIP028702 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 14:52:45 GMT Received: from cgianelloni.nuvox.net (216.215.202.4.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.4]) by smtp05.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id k4HEqq6N022502 for ; Wed, 17 May 2006 10:52:52 -0400 Received: by cgianelloni.nuvox.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 17 May 2006 10:50:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Paludis and Profiles From: Chris Gianelloni To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <31a24e290605170030p472e282ci7e9d02b74a7e2d38@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060516161549.442b4d8a@localhost> <446A1B5D.8040402@gentoo.org> <200605170719.47215.ian@gentoo.org> <31a24e290605170030p472e282ci7e9d02b74a7e2d38@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6Fyrhxh3yBXSu76VjwFQ" Organization: Gentoo Linux Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 10:50:39 -0400 Message-Id: <1147877439.16876.18.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Archives-Salt: 238a4548-f279-4ef7-84ba-de92d26e8b2b X-Archives-Hash: c7a9ee9fa1f11c05527489e82587b724 --=-6Fyrhxh3yBXSu76VjwFQ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 09:30 +0200, Matthijs van der Vleuten wrote: > On 5/17/06, Christian Hartmann wrote: > > > With respect to the "hey support omg!" comments i say stick a big fat > > > README about being an experimental profile or something like that and > > > that's it. Usually bug reports require "emerge --info" so it'll be ea= sy > > > to flag invalid ones anyway. > > > > Well. Marking a bug invalid doesn't make the real problem go away... bu= t the > > users. >=20 > I'd say that's exactly the intention of INVALID. If I were to file, > say, a bug in GCC at Gentoo's Bugzilla instead of GCC's, it would be > marked INVALID. (Unless, of course, the bug is caused by Gentoo's > patches.) No. It should be marked as UPSTREAM and a bug should be filed in GCC's bug tracker or the authors emailed if there's no tracker. --=20 Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering - Strategic Lead x86 Architecture Team Games - Developer Gentoo Linux --=-6Fyrhxh3yBXSu76VjwFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEazg/kT4lNIS36YERAgyDAJ4/k/ytr7YnCIUc/GBi7EMrzUjThwCeOUJy LxSYfiV1ndqoKr7eEFot21E= =CuK6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6Fyrhxh3yBXSu76VjwFQ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list