public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Re: Re: When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable?
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 10:57:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1146819477.19514.12.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3eub8$fcr$1@sea.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2361 bytes --]

On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 09:20 +0200, Bart Braem wrote:
> > That way, people who prefer stability over the latest features can run
> > "arch", and everyone who bitches about packages being out of date can run
> > the middle tag, and "~arch" can be kept for testing.
> 
> I really, really agree here. I know this seems like a flamewar but it is
> starting to annoy me. There are several packages that are several months
> behind the official releases. I am going to name some of them:
> Firefox 1.5: 5 months (the entire world uses it now, in stable)
broken, unstable, no good
(memleaks and horrible performance on a substantial amount of
systems ...)

> KDE 3.5.2: 1.5 months (I know our devs get prereleases, so we had this time)
~40 bugs open as Chris said. No go.

> Xorg 7: 5 months
I don't know the status on this one, but I guess it's going to be done
when it's done

Also GCC 4.x - all others are using it, right?
Well ... 4.0 was a mess, 4.1 is looking good and should be available
soon - when everything compiles with it.

> I know we have a lot of work to do, but I have some concerns. How long are
> we going to maintain old packages? KDE 3.4.3 is no longer supported by the
> KDE developpers. Firefox extensions for 1.0 are becoming extinct. 
> You are also getting a lot of work trying to fix bugs in old software. Most
> probably you are starting to backport bugfixes, is this the way we want
> things to go?
No, but if the new version is buggy it's not going to be unmasked just
because upstream would prefer that.

> I understand you don't care about how many users you have, Gentoo is not a
> bussiness. But if I try to convince users about the current situation that
> is hard. I can't explain this, I really can't. My only answer is "put it
> in /etc/portage/package.keywords". But that one is growing very fast...
So go ~x86 all the way ... it's been good enough for me for ~2 years now

I understand your frustration, I'd like Gentoo to be more "bleeding
edge" as it used to be, but then I have an install that was originally
1.2 (I think, might have been 1.4rc) that was updated and recompiled
every now and then - that's really awesome, I don't know of any other
distro that offers such good migration paths.

Just my 2 cents,

Patrick
-- 
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-05  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-03 23:05 [gentoo-dev] When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable? m h
2006-04-03 23:11 ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-04-03 23:44   ` Aron Griffis
2006-04-04  2:16   ` Kari Hazzard
2006-04-04  2:28     ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-04-04  2:50       ` lnxg33k
2006-04-04  3:23         ` Jason S
2006-04-04  3:37       ` Kari Hazzard
2006-04-04 15:12         ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-04-04 16:11           ` Kari Hazzard
2006-04-04 16:37             ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-04-04 17:04               ` m h
2006-04-04 17:42                 ` Phil Richards
2006-04-04 21:05                 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-04-04 21:09               ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-04-04 20:55           ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-04-04 16:42       ` Simon Stelling
2006-04-04 20:52       ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-04-04  2:37     ` Grant Goodyear
2006-04-04 12:05       ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-04-04  9:21   ` Michael Cummings
2006-04-04  9:42     ` Jan Kundrát
2006-04-04 10:38       ` Michael Cummings
2006-04-03 23:13 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-04-03 23:25   ` m h
2006-04-04  5:51     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-04-04  6:16       ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-04-04 10:10         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-04-04  6:09   ` [gentoo-dev] " Philip Webb
2006-04-04  6:42     ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-04-04 10:28       ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-04-04 12:03       ` [gentoo-dev] " Philip Webb
2006-04-04  9:12   ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-04-04  9:51     ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-04-04 10:14     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-04-04 10:38       ` Caleb Tennis
2006-04-04 11:17         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-04-04 12:18         ` [gentoo-dev] " Philip Webb
2006-05-04 11:48           ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Braem
2006-05-04 12:18             ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-05-04 12:30               ` Jeff Rollin
2006-05-05  7:14               ` Philip Webb
2006-05-05  7:35                 ` Jakub Moc
2006-05-05  7:56                   ` Philip Webb
2006-05-05  8:11                     ` Jakub Moc
2006-05-05  9:03                       ` Michael Kirkland
2006-05-05  8:16                   ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-05-05 20:09                 ` Jeff Smelser
2006-05-06  9:03                 ` Richard Fish
2006-05-04 12:21             ` Jeff Rollin
2006-05-04 13:45               ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-05-04 14:28                 ` Jeff Rollin
2006-05-04 23:29               ` Michael Kirkland
2006-05-05  5:28                 ` Jeff Rollin
2006-05-05 10:30                   ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-05-05  6:32                 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)
2006-05-05 11:20                   ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-05-05 13:23                     ` Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)
2006-05-05 14:38                       ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-05-05 18:37                         ` Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)
2006-05-05 19:10                           ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-05-05 19:08                       ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-05-05  7:20                 ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Braem
2006-05-05  8:03                   ` Harald van Dijk
2006-05-05  8:33                   ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-05-05  8:43                     ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Braem
2006-05-05 11:28                       ` Duncan
2006-05-05  8:57                   ` Patrick Lauer [this message]
2006-05-05  9:44                   ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-05-06  6:48                     ` Philip Webb
2006-05-06 11:41                       ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-05-06 12:48                         ` Philip Webb
2006-05-06 13:01                           ` Jakub Moc
2006-05-06 13:18                         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-05-05 10:50                   ` [gentoo-dev] " Caleb Tennis
2006-05-05 11:27                     ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Braem
2006-05-05 11:19                   ` [gentoo-dev] " Carsten Lohrke
2006-05-05 11:50                     ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Braem
2006-05-06  9:28                     ` [gentoo-dev] " Richard Fish
2006-05-05  7:37                 ` [gentoo-dev] " Philip Webb
2006-05-05 11:00                   ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-05-05 21:52                   ` [gentoo-dev] " Jan Kundrát
2006-05-05 12:03                 ` Marius Mauch
2006-05-04 13:05             ` Duncan
2006-05-04 13:47               ` Guillaume Pujol
2006-05-06  8:56             ` Richard Fish
2006-04-04 11:50     ` [gentoo-dev] " Carsten Lohrke
2006-04-08 13:41 ` Wernfried Haas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1146819477.19514.12.camel@localhost \
    --to=patrick@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox