From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable?
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 10:57:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1146819477.19514.12.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3eub8$fcr$1@sea.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2361 bytes --]
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 09:20 +0200, Bart Braem wrote:
> > That way, people who prefer stability over the latest features can run
> > "arch", and everyone who bitches about packages being out of date can run
> > the middle tag, and "~arch" can be kept for testing.
>
> I really, really agree here. I know this seems like a flamewar but it is
> starting to annoy me. There are several packages that are several months
> behind the official releases. I am going to name some of them:
> Firefox 1.5: 5 months (the entire world uses it now, in stable)
broken, unstable, no good
(memleaks and horrible performance on a substantial amount of
systems ...)
> KDE 3.5.2: 1.5 months (I know our devs get prereleases, so we had this time)
~40 bugs open as Chris said. No go.
> Xorg 7: 5 months
I don't know the status on this one, but I guess it's going to be done
when it's done
Also GCC 4.x - all others are using it, right?
Well ... 4.0 was a mess, 4.1 is looking good and should be available
soon - when everything compiles with it.
> I know we have a lot of work to do, but I have some concerns. How long are
> we going to maintain old packages? KDE 3.4.3 is no longer supported by the
> KDE developpers. Firefox extensions for 1.0 are becoming extinct.
> You are also getting a lot of work trying to fix bugs in old software. Most
> probably you are starting to backport bugfixes, is this the way we want
> things to go?
No, but if the new version is buggy it's not going to be unmasked just
because upstream would prefer that.
> I understand you don't care about how many users you have, Gentoo is not a
> bussiness. But if I try to convince users about the current situation that
> is hard. I can't explain this, I really can't. My only answer is "put it
> in /etc/portage/package.keywords". But that one is growing very fast...
So go ~x86 all the way ... it's been good enough for me for ~2 years now
I understand your frustration, I'd like Gentoo to be more "bleeding
edge" as it used to be, but then I have an install that was originally
1.2 (I think, might have been 1.4rc) that was updated and recompiled
every now and then - that's really awesome, I don't know of any other
distro that offers such good migration paths.
Just my 2 cents,
Patrick
--
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-05 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-03 23:05 [gentoo-dev] When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable? m h
2006-04-03 23:11 ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-04-03 23:44 ` Aron Griffis
2006-04-04 2:16 ` Kari Hazzard
2006-04-04 2:28 ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-04-04 2:50 ` lnxg33k
2006-04-04 3:23 ` Jason S
2006-04-04 3:37 ` Kari Hazzard
2006-04-04 15:12 ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-04-04 16:11 ` Kari Hazzard
2006-04-04 16:37 ` Stephen P. Becker
2006-04-04 17:04 ` m h
2006-04-04 17:42 ` Phil Richards
2006-04-04 21:05 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-04-04 21:09 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-04-04 20:55 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-04-04 16:42 ` Simon Stelling
2006-04-04 20:52 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-04-04 2:37 ` Grant Goodyear
2006-04-04 12:05 ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-04-04 9:21 ` Michael Cummings
2006-04-04 9:42 ` Jan Kundrát
2006-04-04 10:38 ` Michael Cummings
2006-04-03 23:13 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-04-03 23:25 ` m h
2006-04-04 5:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-04-04 6:16 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-04-04 10:10 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-04-04 6:09 ` [gentoo-dev] " Philip Webb
2006-04-04 6:42 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-04-04 10:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-04-04 12:03 ` [gentoo-dev] " Philip Webb
2006-04-04 9:12 ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-04-04 9:51 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-04-04 10:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-04-04 10:38 ` Caleb Tennis
2006-04-04 11:17 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-04-04 12:18 ` [gentoo-dev] " Philip Webb
2006-05-04 11:48 ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Braem
2006-05-04 12:18 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-05-04 12:30 ` Jeff Rollin
2006-05-05 7:14 ` Philip Webb
2006-05-05 7:35 ` Jakub Moc
2006-05-05 7:56 ` Philip Webb
2006-05-05 8:11 ` Jakub Moc
2006-05-05 9:03 ` Michael Kirkland
2006-05-05 8:16 ` Chris Bainbridge
2006-05-05 20:09 ` Jeff Smelser
2006-05-06 9:03 ` Richard Fish
2006-05-04 12:21 ` Jeff Rollin
2006-05-04 13:45 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-05-04 14:28 ` Jeff Rollin
2006-05-04 23:29 ` Michael Kirkland
2006-05-05 5:28 ` Jeff Rollin
2006-05-05 10:30 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-05-05 6:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)
2006-05-05 11:20 ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-05-05 13:23 ` Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)
2006-05-05 14:38 ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-05-05 18:37 ` Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)
2006-05-05 19:10 ` Carsten Lohrke
2006-05-05 19:08 ` Chris Gianelloni
2006-05-05 7:20 ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Braem
2006-05-05 8:03 ` Harald van Dijk
2006-05-05 8:33 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-05-05 8:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Braem
2006-05-05 11:28 ` Duncan
2006-05-05 8:57 ` Patrick Lauer [this message]
2006-05-05 9:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-05-06 6:48 ` Philip Webb
2006-05-06 11:41 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2006-05-06 12:48 ` Philip Webb
2006-05-06 13:01 ` Jakub Moc
2006-05-06 13:18 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-05-05 10:50 ` [gentoo-dev] " Caleb Tennis
2006-05-05 11:27 ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Braem
2006-05-05 11:19 ` [gentoo-dev] " Carsten Lohrke
2006-05-05 11:50 ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Braem
2006-05-06 9:28 ` [gentoo-dev] " Richard Fish
2006-05-05 7:37 ` [gentoo-dev] " Philip Webb
2006-05-05 11:00 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2006-05-05 21:52 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jan Kundrát
2006-05-05 12:03 ` Marius Mauch
2006-05-04 13:05 ` Duncan
2006-05-04 13:47 ` Guillaume Pujol
2006-05-06 8:56 ` Richard Fish
2006-04-04 11:50 ` [gentoo-dev] " Carsten Lohrke
2006-04-08 13:41 ` Wernfried Haas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1146819477.19514.12.camel@localhost \
--to=patrick@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox