From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FVrvP-0003DB-5O for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:15:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3IFFfkV028223; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:15:41 GMT Received: from prebackup.warande.net (prebackup.warande.net [145.97.193.201]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3IFDkaP029640 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:13:46 GMT Received: from rivendell (216pc222.sshunet.nl [145.97.222.216]) by prebackup.warande.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00574C006 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:13:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-util/cccc From: foser To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200604181053.01775.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20060415044904.GD18636@aerie.halcy0n.com> <200604181022.28459.vapier@gentoo.org> <1145371286.18478.42.camel@rivendell> <200604181053.01775.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9ecg3zPi4Brvf8YzhXqe" Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:13:45 +0200 Message-Id: <1145373225.18478.51.camel@rivendell> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 X-Archives-Salt: 28c5a3c8-366d-47cd-9be5-024041ed0a5a X-Archives-Hash: c208d93d7422d322c8b2f70b26a75ecf --=-9ecg3zPi4Brvf8YzhXqe Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-04-18 at 10:53 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > dont know what policy you're referring to seeing as how we dont have any=20 > concerning unmaintained packages Still hiding... c'mon you are better than this. > sure, for new packages ... cccc isnt a new package The policy concerning metadata makes no difference between new/(un)maintained. It just says that every package should have one. So if you come across a pack that doesn't and you touch it, you need to fix that. - foser --=-9ecg3zPi4Brvf8YzhXqe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBERQIp8WG+0iaGxDMRAjjJAJ4sU3RRaI/vqb4IVkSB+N6gs0mB/ACgj6dz IQRNBj3+OaIsiyimoSiMofQ= =P5n8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9ecg3zPi4Brvf8YzhXqe-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list