From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FVnyW-0003oq-E8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:02:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3IB2gjJ003115; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:02:42 GMT Received: from prebackup.warande.net (prebackup.warande.net [145.97.193.201]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3IB0pLi020022 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:00:51 GMT Received: from rivendell (216pc222.sshunet.nl [145.97.222.216]) by prebackup.warande.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E964C006 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:00:48 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-util/cccc From: foser To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200604161642.33613.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20060415044904.GD18636@aerie.halcy0n.com> <200604151424.02003.vapier@gentoo.org> <1145200626.24165.5.camel@rivendell> <200604161642.33613.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-R3FmNQJy6ugLZKdHTEJ/" Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:00:43 +0200 Message-Id: <1145358044.18478.11.camel@rivendell> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 X-Archives-Salt: a566aeca-5ec4-46ce-bc54-75135e2a97c7 X-Archives-Hash: 1829dae6238b4df6ce5cd6c8ab7b8769 --=-R3FmNQJy6ugLZKdHTEJ/ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2006-04-16 at 16:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > well the logical thing would be to go to bugzilla and search for "cccc" .= ..=20 > and guess what ? no more open bug reports I already did that when I wrote it, actually there still is an open bug for it. So I guess you didn't actually go trough these proposed steps yourself. Anyway, it is completely besides the point, because you or anyone else won't check a week or a month from now if there's bug filed against cccc, that is what maintenance is about. > > I mean, you aren't the maintainer. And there is still the outstanding > > issue that it is unmaintained in Gentoo, are you going to fix that or > > not ? Otherwise it should be masked and removed. >=20 > this is the same argument as already made and rejected ...=20 Where was this rejected and by whom ? By you I guess ? That just doesn't cut it, errors made in the past are no reason to make them again in the future. > feel free to mask=20 > and remove the hundreds of other packages that have no maintainer So now we do have your blessing ? cccc is then up for removal as of this moment. - foser --=-R3FmNQJy6ugLZKdHTEJ/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBERMbb8WG+0iaGxDMRAlkWAKDmhy9I0OeObTQYeUZJhAuHMhDnoQCYgb1r 8I8vxuuQa4t2NA/lvk70sQ== =P7JP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-R3FmNQJy6ugLZKdHTEJ/-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list