From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FVaL1-00065t-N2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:28:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k3HKSue7026756; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:28:56 GMT Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k3HKR0Xt015693 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:27:00 GMT Received: from TesterServ.TesterNet ([66.131.38.23]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IXV008C6VGP6W60@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:26:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from uucp by TesterServ.TesterNet with local-rmail (Exim 4.50) id 1FVaJ6-0000GU-P3 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:26:48 -0400 Received: by TesterTop.tester.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7EBD4104870; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:26:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:26:41 -0400 From: Olivier =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Cr=EAte?= Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] xorg-server 1.0.99/1.1 ABI break In-reply-to: <4443F4F2.5080007@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-id: <1145305602.10002.4.camel@localhost> Organization: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-jWSPkUhW3MCAxblYpn6f" References: <44432517.7050903@gentoo.org> <444366A0.6080501@gentoo.org> <4443C024.1030405@gentoo.org> <4443E65B.1060503@gentoo.org> <4443F4F2.5080007@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: fcaf2c2d-0393-45b6-8e70-8bcec16c8602 X-Archives-Hash: 35a37f0ee4aea5b16256d5db77eb64fa --=-jWSPkUhW3MCAxblYpn6f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2006-17-04 at 13:05 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Alec Warner wrote: > > Well the semantics of the blocker is that the new driver won't work wit= h=20 > > the old server; is that true? Or just the old drivers won't work with=20 > > the new server? >=20 > New server requires new drivers. Old server requires old drivers. There=20 > is no valid combination of new and old. Then you should probably has new drivers block old servers and new servers block old drivers... --=20 Olivier Cr=EAte tester@gentoo.org Gentoo Developer --=-jWSPkUhW3MCAxblYpn6f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEQ/oBHTiOWk7ZorsRAuuFAJ4v5p1QD1pswMranPul2VTCMVwOLQCdEjKg wcTutkQkL5pi4/N1z3NSxR4= =FILm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jWSPkUhW3MCAxblYpn6f-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list