[gentoo-dev] last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

[gentoo-dev] last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

[Alin Nastac]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 289 bytes --]

Unless someone has a really good reason not to,
app-mobilephone/openobex-apps will be removed from the tree on April 20th.
Most programs found in this package were included in
>=dev-libs/openobex-1.2.
The only exception, obexserver, have a better replacement in
app-mobilephone/sobexsrv.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 258 bytes --]

[gentoo-dev] Re: last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

[Simon Holm Thøgersen]

tor, 13 04 2006 kl. 22:55 +0300, skrev Alin Nastac: 
> Unless someone has a really good reason not to,
> app-mobilephone/openobex-apps will be removed from the tree on April 20th.
> Most programs found in this package were included in
> >=dev-libs/openobex-1.2.
> The only exception, obexserver, have a better replacement in
> app-mobilephone/sobexsrv.

One would expect >=dev-libs/openobex-1.2 to be in the tree when you say
so, but I see no trace of it.


Simon Holm Thøgersen


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

[Alin Nastac]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 641 bytes --]

Simon Holm Thøgersen wrote:

>tor, 13 04 2006 kl. 22:55 +0300, skrev Alin Nastac: 
>  
>
>>Unless someone has a really good reason not to,
>>app-mobilephone/openobex-apps will be removed from the tree on April 20th.
>>Most programs found in this package were included in
>>    
>>
>>>=dev-libs/openobex-1.2.
>>>      
>>>
>>The only exception, obexserver, have a better replacement in
>>app-mobilephone/sobexsrv.
>>    
>>
>
>One would expect >=dev-libs/openobex-1.2 to be in the tree when you say
>so, but I see no trace of it.
>  
>
Opps... I thought ticho already add it to the tree.
I will bump openobex ASAP.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

[Alin Nastac]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 608 bytes --]

Simon Holm Thøgersen wrote:

>tor, 13 04 2006 kl. 22:55 +0300, skrev Alin Nastac: 
>  
>
>>Unless someone has a really good reason not to,
>>app-mobilephone/openobex-apps will be removed from the tree on April 20th.
>>Most programs found in this package were included in
>>    
>>
>>>=dev-libs/openobex-1.2.
>>>      
>>>
>>The only exception, obexserver, have a better replacement in
>>app-mobilephone/sobexsrv.
>>    
>>
>
>One would expect >=dev-libs/openobex-1.2 to be in the tree when you say
>so, but I see no trace of it.
>
>  
>
dev-libs/openobex-1.2 is now in the tree.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 258 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

[Henrik Brix Andersen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 278 bytes --]

On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:06:00AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> dev-libs/openobex-1.2 is now in the tree.

Why did you p.mask openobex-apps before openobex-1.2 is stable?

./Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 213 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

[Alin Nastac]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 418 bytes --]

Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:

>On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 02:06:00AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
>  
>
>>dev-libs/openobex-1.2 is now in the tree.
>>    
>>
>
>Why did you p.mask openobex-apps before openobex-1.2 is stable?
>  
>
For forcing users to test openobex-1.2 ;)
I think openobex-1.2 should be unmasked, but I am waiting for ticho to
actually do this.
See bug 122262 <http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122262>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

[Henrik Brix Andersen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 752 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 09:19:38AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> >Why did you p.mask openobex-apps before openobex-1.2 is stable?
> >
> For forcing users to test openobex-1.2 ;)
> I think openobex-1.2 should be unmasked, but I am waiting for ticho to
> actually do this.
> See bug 122262 <http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122262>

You can not package.mask a stable package in favor of a
package.masked, unstable package unless there are severe security
issues. That's not how it works.

Please solve this mess - don't package.mask openobex-apps until
openobex-1.2 has the same KEYWORDS as openobex.

./Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 213 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

[Henrik Brix Andersen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 329 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Please solve this mess - don't package.mask openobex-apps until
> openobex-1.2 has the same KEYWORDS as openobex.

... as openobex-apps, of course.

./Brix
-- 
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 213 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rites for app-mobilephone/openobex-apps

[Alin Nastac]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 333 bytes --]

Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:

>On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:21:29AM +0200, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
>  
>
>>Please solve this mess - don't package.mask openobex-apps until
>>openobex-1.2 has the same KEYWORDS as openobex.
>>    
>>
>
>... as openobex-apps, of course.
>
>./Brix
>  
>
OK, I've removed the hard mask on openobex-apps.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]