From: Christel Dahlskjaer <christel@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving Gentoo User Relations
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:41:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1144420894.20252.49.camel@gaspode> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060407102154.4690b806@snowdrop.home>
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 10:21 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 03:30:10 +0100 Christel Dahlskjaer
> <christel@gentoo.org> wrote:
> | What do you believe could make Gentoo more attractive
> | to new users and to current users?
>
> Something that's often missed in these discussions... The only serious
> interaction between Gentoo and nearly all of our end users is through
> the tree, package manager and related tools and our documentation. Most
> of our users don't regularly read mailing lists, use IRC or the forums,
> so the only thing they really see is what happens when they emerge
> --sync and install things.
Nod, I may have dreamt this, but I believe I saw mention of some sort of
implemented news reader-esque idea. Is that something you know if people
have given any thought? Discussed? Is it an idea that could be worth
looking at again?
> I'm not entirely sure how bugzilla fits into all this. I suspect that
> it's nowhere near as widely used by end users as it could be.
As for using bugzilla for information, I am not entire sure. As for the
sort of stuff that has been brought up bugzilla wise are things like
'Better how-to's" to ensure it's easier for users to write good bug
reports and less time demanding for devs to respond to them (This is
already being worked on by cwp et al)
Other ideas are things such as introducing bugzillas voting system.
> Three things I can think of that can be drawn from this:
>
> * GLEP 42
Ding! The 'news reader esque' idea I thought I had dreamt may very well
have been just that, I read through all the GLEPs the other day, and I
suspect that may be where I got it from. Thank you.
> * All the pretty pink unicorns in the world aren't going to make a
> scrap of difference if the tree keeps breaking.
Ack, however much I love pretty pink unicorns (and pretty pink portage,
and pretty pink baselayout and most other things that are well, pretty
and pink) I agree with you there.
Personally, I like the idea of such things as higher standards, more
direction, code reviews, developing coding standards, document
functions, getting the proper comments in place in code (I'm quite
astonished by the dearth of comments and how it looks like it hasn't
been reviewd for quite some time in places). However, this may be better
off in a different discussion and not on a userrel thread.
> * If we're looking to increase the flow of end users -> super users ->
> developers, perhaps we should focus more upon improving development
> tools or development documentation.
Perhaps that is somewhere else we need to look.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-07 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-07 2:30 [gentoo-dev] Improving Gentoo User Relations Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 2:17 ` [gentoo-dev] How many users? [WAS] " Donnie Berkholz
2006-04-07 3:22 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 8:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Christopher O'Neill
2006-04-07 9:07 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-04-07 9:33 ` Grobian
2006-04-07 9:49 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-04-07 11:32 ` Patrick Lauer
2006-04-07 14:24 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-11 20:55 ` Tamas Sarga
2006-04-07 14:22 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 14:19 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 13:35 ` Martin Ehmsen
2006-04-07 14:45 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 13:43 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-04-07 14:57 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-08 19:29 ` lnxg33k
2006-04-07 9:33 ` Donnie Berkholz
2006-04-07 9:56 ` Jakub Moc
2006-04-15 8:45 ` Philipp Riegger
2006-04-07 10:37 ` Jonathan Coome
2006-04-07 14:27 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-08 21:55 ` Tom Wesley
2006-04-07 14:26 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 13:20 ` Grant Goodyear
2006-04-07 14:47 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-15 9:10 ` Philipp Riegger
2006-04-07 13:51 ` Duncan
2006-04-07 14:14 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 9:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2006-04-07 14:41 ` Christel Dahlskjaer [this message]
2006-04-07 15:15 ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2006-04-07 15:42 ` Alec Warner
2006-04-07 15:47 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 17:01 ` Alexandre Buisse
2006-04-08 15:12 ` Paul de Vrieze
2006-04-08 19:15 ` lnxg33k
2006-04-07 16:48 ` Michael Cummings
2006-04-07 17:47 ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2006-04-08 19:07 ` lnxg33k
2006-04-08 22:27 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-07 11:32 ` Thomas Cort
2006-04-07 14:43 ` Christel Dahlskjaer
2006-04-17 8:34 ` Volkov Peter
2006-04-17 19:05 ` Curtis Napier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1144420894.20252.49.camel@gaspode \
--to=christel@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox