From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FRge1-0003YH-NT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 02:24:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k372O9q6021980; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 02:24:09 GMT Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k372MJ8g015521 for ; Fri, 7 Apr 2006 02:22:19 GMT Received: from [172.23.170.136] (helo=anti-virus01-07) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FRgc7-0004Me-9A for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 03:22:19 +0100 Received: from [82.32.206.2] (helo=[192.168.1.210]) by asmtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FRgc6-0004OP-Q0 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 03:22:18 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How many users? [WAS] Improving Gentoo User Relations From: Christel Dahlskjaer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <4435CBAF.4010701@gentoo.org> References: <1144377010.5485.82.camel@gaspode> <4435CBAF.4010701@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 04:22:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1144380128.5485.88.camel@gaspode> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7a3edb35-657a-4976-acf1-85e9b2b9ecf5 X-Archives-Hash: b1e1b2f441687f1092714a408493fd53 On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 19:17 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Christel Dahlskjaer wrote: > > So now we are faced with the challenge of resurrecting the project and > > making it the best it can be. We have a blank page to colour in in such > > a way it becomes attractive to the majority of our ~200,000 users, and > > Have we lost 100,000? The last estimate I saw was 50% higher. 300,000 would be even better! 200K was the number I was given after asking a bunch of people, well, it was the highest number (other suggestions was 'over ten') and as I understand it the data they had were rather old, so if your 300K is newer and more accurate then that is even more fantastic! C. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list